This video features constitutional attorney Mark Smith of The Four Boxes Diner, who analyzes a critical admission made by the DOJ during the Rahimi oral argument. Smith argues this concession, regarding the application of historical analysis for Second Amendment principles, can be used to challenge 'assault weapon' bans and other firearm restrictions. He highlights the legal doctrine of estoppel and its implications for future litigation.
This video analyzes the US Department of Justice's admissions during the *United States v. Rahimi* Supreme Court oral arguments. Host Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney, highlights how the DOJ conceded that executive branch officials have limited discretion in subjective gun licensing decisions, a significant win for Second Amendment rights. The discussion emphasizes the *Bruen* decision's requirement for objective licensing criteria and contrasts it with subjective standards like 'good moral character.'
You've reached the end! 2 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.