Videos tagged with Federal Supremacy

Texas House Bill 162 aims to significantly restrict the scope and enforcement of red flag laws within the state. The bill redefines an extreme risk protection order to require a basis in conduct resulting in a criminal charge, thereby preventing orders based solely on allegations without criminal charges. It also introduces criminal penalties for serving or enforcing orders not issued under Texas law, though a provision attempting to nullify federal laws infringing on due process or Second Amendment rights may face federal preemption challenges.

This video provides an expert legal analysis from William Kirk of Washington Gun Law regarding Judge Roger Benitez's ruling in Rhode v. Bonta. Kirk details the grounds on which California's ammunition background check law was struck down and explains the legal factors considered for a stay pending appeal. The analysis highlights the court's denial of California's request for a stay, emphasizing the failure to demonstrate irreparable injury, while cautioning that the 9th Circuit may still overturn the decision.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's 8-1 decision denying a stay for Missouri's Second Amendment Preservation Act (SAPA). The speaker, an expert in legal analysis, details how SAPA attempts to shield state agents from enforcing federal gun laws, its comparison to Texas's SB8 abortion law enforcement mechanism, and the implications of the Supreme Court's ruling, particularly concerning the 11th Amendment and Section 1983 lawsuits.

This video discusses Governor Greg Gianforte of Montana's letter to Attorney General Merrick Garland, pushing back against the ATF's new pistol brace rule. It highlights Montana's House Bill 258, which prohibits state and local officials from enforcing federal firearm bans, including new interpretations of existing laws. The segment emphasizes a growing trend of state-level resistance to federal gun control measures.