The Anti-Red Flag Law, Coming From Texas

Published on December 18, 2024
Duration: 9:49

Texas House Bill 162 aims to significantly restrict the scope and enforcement of red flag laws within the state. The bill redefines an extreme risk protection order to require a basis in conduct resulting in a criminal charge, thereby preventing orders based solely on allegations without criminal charges. It also introduces criminal penalties for serving or enforcing orders not issued under Texas law, though a provision attempting to nullify federal laws infringing on due process or Second Amendment rights may face federal preemption challenges.

Quick Summary

Texas House Bill 162 seeks to repeal and restrict red flag laws by requiring that extreme risk protection orders be based on conduct resulting in a criminal charge. It also introduces criminal penalties for enforcing orders not issued under Texas law, though certain provisions may face federal preemption challenges.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Texas Gun Law TV
  2. 00:10Texas House Bill 162 Overview
  3. 01:14Details of Texas HB 162
  4. 01:35Redefining Extreme Risk Protection Orders
  5. 02:32Basis for Red Flag Orders: Criminal Charges Required
  6. 03:38Criminalizing Improper Red Flag Enforcement
  7. 04:03Who Does HB 162 Apply To?
  8. 04:50Potential Federal Preemption Issues
  9. 05:53Advice for Texas Legislators
  10. 06:16Texas Missing an Opportunity?
  11. 06:25The Problem with Red Flag Law Implementation
  12. 07:01Lack of Procedural Due Process
  13. 08:03A Model for Red Flag Laws
  14. 08:51Conclusion and Next Steps

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the main purpose of Texas House Bill 162 regarding red flag laws?

Texas House Bill 162 aims to repeal and significantly restrict existing red flag laws. It redefines what constitutes a valid extreme risk protection order, requiring it to be based on conduct that resulted in a criminal charge, and makes improper enforcement a criminal offense.

How does Texas HB 162 change the basis for issuing red flag orders?

Under HB 162, an extreme risk protection order can only be issued if the basis for it involves conduct that has resulted in a criminal charge against the individual. This prevents orders from being issued solely on allegations without any criminal charges being filed.

What are the potential legal challenges for Texas HB 162?

A provision in HB 162 that declares certain federal laws unenforceable if they infringe on due process or Second Amendment rights could face federal preemption challenges, similar to issues encountered with other state-level 'preservation acts'.

What is the penalty for enforcing an invalid red flag order under HB 162?

If enacted, Texas HB 162 would make it a state felony offense for any person to serve or enforce an extreme risk protective order against an individual in Texas, unless that order was issued under the laws of Texas.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Washington Gun Law

View all →