This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, provides an expert-level analysis of how to challenge assault weapon bans, using the Illinois case 'Barnett v. Raoul' as a primary example. It details the strategic use of 'Findings of Fact' and 'Conclusions of Law' by plaintiffs like Gun Owners of America to argue that banned firearms are commonly owned for lawful self-defense and lack historical justification for prohibition. The content emphasizes understanding legal precedents and the definition of 'in common use' to effectively contest such legislation.
This video discusses the legal challenges and delays surrounding Oregon's Ballot Measure 114, specifically focusing on the Oregon Attorney General's attempts to appeal a court ruling that struck down the measure. The appeal is reportedly stalled due to the AG's office filing motions to reconsider the trial court's findings of fact, including the unavailability of NICS background checks for pre-purchase licenses and the integral nature of magazines to firearms. The video highlights the legal strategy of the AG's office in trying to alter the factual basis for the appeal.
You've reached the end! 2 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.