Videos tagged with Firearms Licensing

This video discusses recent and proposed gun legislation in Illinois, arguing that the laws are politically motivated rather than safety-focused. It details the Protect Illinois Citizens Act (PICA) and its low compliance rate, as well as Senate Bill SB 2279 and the RIFL Act (House Bill 3320), which aim to license manufacturers and hold them financially responsible for gun violence. The speaker, an Illinoisan and firearms instructor, advises residents to obtain FOID cards and concealed carry permits while they still can.

This video provides a critical analysis of the 'Stop Online Ammunition Sales Act' (H.R. 7166), a federal bill aiming to regulate online ammunition sales. The speaker, with high authority in Second Amendment news, details the bill's requirements for federal licensing of all ammo sellers, mandatory face-to-face verification with government ID, and reporting of bulk sales. The analysis highlights the potential logistical burdens and argues the bill targets law-abiding citizens.

This video discusses proposed new regulations for gun shows, emphasizing that existing licensing and requirements for Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs) and Certificates of Eligibility (COEs) for vendors already cover firearm and ammunition sales. The speaker encourages viewers to submit comments on regulatory proposals to highlight overlooked issues and ensure individual perspectives are considered by authorities.

This video discusses legal challenges faced by Black gun owners in Chicago who were charged with felonies despite possessing valid Firearms Owner's Identification (FOID) cards and Concealed Carry Licenses (CCLs). It highlights instances where law enforcement allegedly failed to verify license status correctly, leading to wrongful arrests. The content emphasizes the importance of understanding Illinois's firearms licensing laws, renewal processes, and proper procedures for law enforcement during traffic stops involving armed individuals.

This video provides an expert analysis from Guns & Gadgets regarding the Department of Justice's (DOJ) actions concerning the ATF's 'zero tolerance' policy. The speaker, an expert in Second Amendment news, details how the DOJ is defending this policy in court, despite verbal repeals and White House statements suggesting it was an abuse of power. The content highlights legal challenges brought by Gun Owners of America (GOA) against the ATF, focusing on the policy's impact on small gun businesses and the potential infringement on Second Amendment rights.

This video, hosted by constitutional attorney Mark Smith, analyzes the 'bottlenecks' or 'choke points' implemented by anti-gun states to hinder citizens' ability to obtain concealed carry permits post-Bruin. Smith identifies six key areas: staffing shortages, restricted office hours, overcomplicated applications, burdensome supplementary documents, unpublished requirements, and excessive fees, arguing these create undue burdens on fundamental Second Amendment rights.

This discussion clarifies the amendment to RA10591 concerning the Permit to Carry Firearms Outside Residence (PTCFOR). Attorney Brian Go explains that the 'threat assessment' requirement for PTCFOR has been removed in House Bill 11539. While some provisions related to threat assessment remain in the law, their application to PTCFOR is no longer mandated, though they might be used for other purposes like gun ban exemptions.

This video discusses the impact of new White House executive orders on Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs), featuring insights from a gun store owner. The conversation highlights how previous administrations tightened regulations, leading to increased FFL closures due to minor clerical errors. The current administration's focus is on reviewing existing rules and their impact on FFLs, with a perceived reduction in immediate threat, though the underlying regulatory framework and enforcement interpretation remain fluid.

This video discusses a controversial Massachusetts court decision regarding firearms licensing. A resident was denied a License to Carry (LTC) based on being deemed 'unsuitable' due to past charges, even though these did not result in convictions. While a district court initially sided with the applicant, a Superior Court overturned this, reinstating the denial based on the 'suitability' clause in Massachusetts law. The lack of a clear definition for 'suitability' in state law is highlighted as a major issue, leading to potential arbitrary denials and infringement on Second Amendment rights.

This video discusses a significant Second Amendment victory in the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals concerning two gun control laws in Hawaii. The court, in a 2-1 decision, struck down provisions requiring handgun acquisition within 30 days of permit issuance and a physical inspection of newly acquired firearms within 5 days. The ruling emphasizes that these requirements are unconstitutional under the Second Amendment as interpreted by the Bruin decision, which mandates that the government must demonstrate a historical tradition of regulation analogous to modern laws.

This video discusses the German government's actions against the political party Alternative for Germany (AfD), including revoking gun licenses for its members. The narrative highlights concerns about political opponents being disarmed and surveilled without due process, drawing parallels to potential trends in other Western countries. It emphasizes the perceived circular logic in the government's justification for these actions.

This video features constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, a member of the US Supreme Court Bar and author for the Georgetown Journal of Law and Public Policy, providing an expert analysis of the Guns Save Life v. Rao case. The case challenges the constitutionality of Illinois' Firearms Owner Identification (FOID) card law, arguing it violates the Second Amendment by infringing upon the right to possess firearms. Smith breaks down the legal arguments, referencing the Bruen decision and its implications, particularly Footnote 9, and discusses the textualist interpretation of the Second Amendment's prohibition against infringement.