This video discusses recent legislative actions in California and Maryland that ban firearms based on specific components, like the cruciform trigger bar, rather than the completed firearm. The California lawsuit 'James v. Bont' was dismissed without prejudice, while Maryland's SB 334 is awaiting the governor's signature, mirroring California's approach. The speaker argues these bans are unconstitutional, citing the Heller decision, and are intended to limit market options rather than address stated concerns like 'switches'.
The lawsuit James v. Bont, challenging California's AB1127 (dubbed the 'Glock ban'), has been stayed by the court. This action, a joint motion by plaintiffs and defendants, effectively halts proceedings and vacates deadlines. The speaker speculates this is due to Glock discontinuing models relevant to the lawsuit, removing the core basis for the legal challenge. Without this challenge, AB1127 will stand, impacting other firearm models as well.
A federal lawsuit, James v. Bont, has been filed against California's AB127, commonly known as the 'Glock ban.' The lawsuit, brought by the FPC, 2AF, NRA, and individual plaintiffs, challenges the constitutionality of the law which bans the sale or transfer of Glock and Glock-style handguns with cruciform trigger bars. Plaintiffs argue these firearms are in common use for self-defense and thus protected by the Second Amendment.
You've reached the end! 3 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.
