Videos tagged with Gorsuch

This video features Mark W. Smith, a Constitutional Attorney and member of the U.S. Supreme Court Bar, discussing a significant legal victory in Virginia. A judge blocked a Democratic attempt to redraw congressional districts, which Smith argues was crucial for maintaining a Republican majority in the House of Representatives and, by extension, protecting Second Amendment rights. The ruling highlighted procedural failures in the Democrats' plan, emphasizing the importance of adhering to constitutional amendment processes.

This video provides an expert legal analysis of the Supreme Court's unanimous decision in Martin v. United States, focusing on its implications for the Second Amendment and government accountability. The analysis highlights how the ruling potentially broadens the scope for individuals to sue federal agencies for misconduct, particularly in cases involving wrongful raids and excessive force, which can disproportionately affect law-abiding gun owners. The speaker, an established legal commentator, emphasizes the importance of this decision in ensuring accountability for federal agencies.

This video discusses the strategic implications of political endorsements for Second Amendment rights, using Kyle Rittenhouse's initial support for Ron Paul over Donald Trump as a case study. The speaker argues that supporting candidates with no chance of winning is strategically unsound and counterproductive to protecting gun rights. It contrasts the potential gun control actions of a Kamala Harris presidency, including judicial appointments and executive orders, with the Second Amendment record of Donald Trump, highlighting key Supreme Court victories achieved during his term.

This video analyzes the Supreme Court's 6-3 ruling in Labrador v. Pope and its implications for Texas's SB4 law. The ruling limits universal preliminary injunctions, impacting how lower courts can block state laws. Plaintiffs are now attempting to use technicalities to avoid the Labrador ruling's application to their cases, creating a complex legal battle over border enforcement and federal versus state authority.

The Supreme Court issued a 6-3 decision in Labrador v. Po, significantly altering the landscape for Second Amendment litigation. The ruling clarifies when the Court will consider emergency appeals, specifically by limiting the scope of preliminary injunctions. Universal or statewide preliminary injunctions are now disfavored, with relief generally restricted to named parties in a lawsuit. This decision impacts how future Second Amendment cases can seek broad injunctive relief, potentially leading to more states and organizations being named as plaintiffs.

This video analyzes an NPR story about Supreme Court Justices Gorsuch and Sotomayor, highlighting the potential impact on Second Amendment rights. The content creator, Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney, debunks the NPR report about a mask dispute between the justices, noting their joint denial. The video argues that the story's true purpose is to discredit the Supreme Court and its decisions, especially those favored by conservatives, thereby undermining the ability to defend rights through the courts when democratic processes fail. It connects this to broader efforts to erode Second Amendment protections.

This video expresses strong disappointment with the Supreme Court's handling of a New York City gun rights case. The speaker criticizes Justice Kavanaugh for siding with the majority that dismissed the case, arguing it was a missed opportunity to reaffirm Second Amendment rights. Justices Alito, Gorsuch, and Thomas dissented, with Alito calling the city's actions manipulative. The speaker suggests that 'conservative' in judicial appointments does not always equate to a commitment to constitutional rights, particularly concerning individual liberties.

This video discusses the Supreme Court's decision not to hear a California concealed carry case, with Justices Kavanaugh and Gorsuch being specifically mentioned. The title expresses disappointment with this outcome. The description includes business inquiries, a disclaimer about the content being for informational and entertainment purposes, and emphasizes safe handling and adherence to legal requirements. It also notes that the content is for entertainment and educational purposes only and that the channel does not sell firearms or parts.

This episode of Gun Talk Radio discusses recent legal victories and ongoing battles for Second Amendment rights. Key topics include the Supreme Court's decision not to hear the Bender v. United States case, which upholds a Third Circuit ruling preventing individuals convicted of certain misdemeanors from losing their firearm rights. The discussion also covers the denial of certiorari in Peruta v. California, impacting the right to carry, and highlights the dissents of Justices Thomas and Gorsuch. The program touches on the importance of legal advocacy and the challenges faced in protecting gun rights.

This episode of CN Live features Bill Whittle filling in for Colion Noir, joined by Kurt Schlichter of Townhall. They discuss insights gained from recent Congressional hearings involving Justice Gorsuch and former FBI Director James Comey. The conversation likely delves into political and legal implications, potentially touching on oversight, investigations, or constitutional matters, given the individuals involved. The show airs on NRATV and is a regular program.