Videos tagged with Judge VanDyke

This CRPA TV episode discusses the Rodi v. Bonta case before the Ninth Circuit, which challenges California's ammunition regulations. The en banc panel composition appears favorable for Second Amendment advocates, with a potential for a Supreme Court appeal if California loses. Expert analysis from CRPA President Chuck Michel highlights the strategic importance of the panel's makeup and the potential impact of the Bruen ruling on future gun law challenges.

This video discusses a controversial Ninth Circuit ruling concerning Olympus Spa, an all-female establishment in Washington State, and its legal battle over gender identity policies. Host Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and Second Amendment advocate, highlights the dissent of Judge Lawrence VanDyke, who criticized the court's decision for compelling the spa to admit individuals identifying as women, even naked males, against its religious beliefs. The case raises significant questions about religious freedom, gender identity, and the interpretation of civil rights laws.

This video discusses the "Nutty 9th" striking again, referencing a legal decision that upholds California's magazine ban. It provides links to Judge VanDyke's video, the California Rifle & Pistol Association (CRPA), and the Second Amendment Law Center (2A LC), indicating a focus on legal challenges to gun control measures. The description also promotes "The GunGuy Uncensored" on Twitter and "Practical Defense Systems" for training, along with various channels and support options for GunGuyTV, emphasizing advocacy and community building within the firearms rights movement.

This video provides a critical update on the Duncan v. Bonta California magazine ban case, detailing the Ninth Circuit's flawed decision and the CRPA's plan to appeal to the Supreme Court. The speaker, demonstrating expert-level legal analysis, highlights how the Ninth Circuit miscategorized magazines and avoided the proper 'text, history, and tradition' test. The case is presented as a prime candidate for SCOTUS review to clarify Second Amendment jurisprudence.

This YouTube video discusses the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' En Banc Panel decision in the Duncan v. Bonta case, a legal battle concerning firearms that has been ongoing for nearly 10 years. The opinion was issued with a 7-4 vote. The video also features a link to a dissent video by Judge VanDyke and promotes Attorneys on Retainer, offering a discount with a specific code. A disclaimer states the content is for educational and entertainment purposes only and not legal advice, with the creator identifying as "NOT" a lawyer. Affiliate links and paid advertisements may be present.

This video provides a critical update on the Duncan v. Bonta California magazine ban case, detailing the Ninth Circuit's repeated attempts to uphold the ban despite Supreme Court rulings. It highlights Judge Benitez's consistent findings against the ban and Judge VanDyke's dissent, which criticizes the Ninth Circuit's procedural maneuvering. The speaker expresses low confidence in the Ninth Circuit's upcoming en banc hearing, anticipating further legal battles.

This video analyzes a "common use" test argument used by anti-gun advocates to deny Second Amendment protections to semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15 and standard-capacity magazines. The argument posits that if these firearms and magazines are not commonly used for self-defense, they are not protected arms. The video challenges this by discussing possession as a form of use, citing historical legal opinions, and emphasizing that the Second Amendment protects more than just self-defense, including recreational uses. It highlights Judge Vandyke's dissent and Justice Stevens' perspective to illustrate the differing legal interpretations.

This video from Langley Outdoors Academy discusses two key legal developments impacting Second Amendment rights. In Michigan, a bill aims to ensure concealed pistol license processing continues during emergencies, countering pandemic-era closures. Meanwhile, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is revisiting a ruling on California gun store closures during emergencies, highlighting ongoing legal battles over gun rights in various jurisdictions.