Videos tagged with Judicial Bias

This video discusses how the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals allegedly manipulates legal precedents like Bruin and Heller to undermine Second Amendment wins. It highlights a perceived bias among some judges, leading to rehearings that contradict initial panel decisions. The core argument is that the court's interpretation of the Second Amendment's applicability is being distorted to achieve policy goals rather than adhering to established legal principles.

This video discusses how certain firearm calibers, specifically .40 S&W and 10mm Auto, can be viewed negatively by judges in self-defense cases, potentially leading to legal trouble. The speaker advises awareness of local judicial sentiment and avoiding ammunition marketed for 'total destruction' to mitigate risks.

This video discusses the sentencing of Dexter Taylor, a software engineer convicted of building firearms in his New York apartment, which were labeled "ghost guns." The speaker criticizes the judge's refusal to allow Second Amendment arguments in court and highlights the legal implications of manufacturing firearms at home, particularly in restrictive jurisdictions. The video also promotes a crowdfunding campaign to support Taylor's legal defense.

This video analyzes a court ruling on Washington's assault weapons ban, clarifying that the decision denied a temporary injunction rather than upholding the ban itself. The speaker criticizes the judge's reasoning, particularly the reliance on 'public interest' and the mischaracterization of banned firearms as 'assault weapons,' arguing these points contradict recent Supreme Court rulings. The analysis suggests the legal challenge is ongoing and offers strategies for supporting gun rights organizations.

This video, featuring constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, delves into the critical role judges play in upholding or undermining Second Amendment rights. It highlights the challenges faced by pro-2A litigants due to judicial biases and procedural hurdles, emphasizing that these issues extend beyond the Supreme Court. The discussion touches on how judicial backgrounds and legal specializations, like patent law, can influence case outcomes, ultimately impacting gun owners' rights.