Videos tagged with Judicial Bias

This video discusses the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' alleged pattern of granting en banc review for Second Amendment cases, arguing it disproportionately impacts pro-gun rights victories. The presenter, Anna, highlights that en banc reviews are typically rare across most legal areas but seem to be frequently sought in gun-related cases. This practice, according to the video, effectively undermines Second Amendment advocacy, treating it as a less significant right. The content references judicial dissents that have flagged this perceived bias, specifically mentioning Judge VanDyke.

This entry details the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals' decision to rehear the United States v. Duarte case en banc, overturning a previous panel ruling that found the prohibition of firearm possession for non-violent felons unconstitutional. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith analyzes the implications, highlighting Judge Lawrence VanDyke's dissent which criticizes the court's pattern of rehearings in Second Amendment cases. The discussion touches on potential future Supreme Court nominees and the ongoing legal battles surrounding gun rights.

This video, featuring constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, delves into the critical role judges play in upholding or undermining Second Amendment rights. It highlights the challenges faced by pro-2A litigants due to judicial biases and procedural hurdles, emphasizing that these issues extend beyond the Supreme Court. The discussion touches on how judicial backgrounds and legal specializations, like patent law, can influence case outcomes, ultimately impacting gun owners' rights.