Videos tagged with Justice Kagan

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, analyzes an amicus brief concerning the Illinois Assault Weapon Ban, consolidated under Barnett v. Raoul. The brief argues that Supreme Court Justices have previously indicated that semi-automatic rifles like the AR-15 are in common use, rendering bans unconstitutional. It addresses the 'dicta' argument by referencing United States v. Bloom, suggesting such statements are persuasive considered expressions.

This video discusses the legal implications of a recent Supreme Court ruling in Smith & Wesson v. Mexico, specifically Justice Kagan's comments on the commonality and lawfulness of semi-automatic rifles. William Kirk, President of Washington Gun Law, analyzes two ongoing cases (NAGR v. Lamont and RMGO v. Town of Superior) where this precedent has been cited. The video aims to educate viewers on how to combat arguments for civilian disarmament by referencing the Supreme Court's statements and provides links to relevant legal documents and resources for staying informed about Second Amendment rights.

This analysis from Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney and author, delves into the potential authorship and implications of the upcoming SCOTUS Second Amendment opinion in the Rahimi case. Smith predicts Justice Alito will author the opinion, anticipating a ruling that upholds the facial constitutionality of 18 USC 922(g)(8) while emphasizing strict due process for disarming individuals.