Videos tagged with Legal Battles

This video features an interview with actor Joe Montana at SHOT Show, discussing his perspective on the Second Amendment and firearms in Hollywood. Montana emphasizes that the Second Amendment is not a political issue but a fundamental right tied to the founding of the nation. He also shares insights into the handling of firearms as props in film and television, highlighting the evolution of safety protocols and the importance of professional expertise on set. The discussion touches upon ongoing legal battles concerning gun rights and the role of organizations like CRPA.

This video from Guns & Gadgets discusses the DOJ's recent, quiet restoration of firearm rights to individuals with felony convictions, a process halted by Congress in 1992. Expert analysis covers the legal history, the impact of the *NYSRPA v. Bruen* ruling, and ongoing legal challenges to firearm prohibitions, suggesting a potential shift in Second Amendment jurisprudence.

This video from CRPA TV discusses the ongoing legal fight in California regarding ammunition laws. It highlights the upcoming oral arguments in March before the Ninth Circuit and the strategic legal and political maneuvering involved. The speaker, an expert, notes the shifting political landscape in California, influenced by budget crises and gubernatorial races, which may impact the state's aggressive stance on litigation.

Instructor Mike explains how false allegations can instantly invalidate court orders concerning child custody and parenting time, regardless of previous legal successes. He emphasizes the significant financial and emotional investment in obtaining these orders, which can be undone by a single unsubstantiated claim. Even if proven false, the damage to one's reputation can be permanent.

This guide details the ATF's history of reclassifying firearm components and the specific case of the Rare Breed FRT. It highlights the legal victory for Rare Breed Triggers and the DOJ, emphasizing the potential for gun owners to challenge agency overreach. The technical aspects of the FRT and historical import bans are also covered, providing context for potential future regulatory actions.

This video discusses California's perceived anti-gun agenda and the ongoing legal and political battles faced by gun owners in the state. It highlights the role of the CRPA (California Rifle and Pistol Association) in defending Second Amendment rights through lawsuits and advocacy. The description emphasizes the importance of donations, memberships, and public voice in continuing this fight for freedom and encourages viewers to join CRPA.

This short discusses ongoing lawsuits against Glock by "blue states" and "blue cities," highlighting the speaker's agreement with a perspective that views Glock as the victim. The video also touches on the sentiment within the 2A and gun communities, suggesting some are turning against Glock, creating a difficult situation for the company facing millions in lawsuits.

This comprehensive analysis delves into the complex legal history and current status of Forced Reset Triggers (FRTs), particularly focusing on Rare Breed Triggers (RBT). It details the legal challenges, ATF determinations, and eventual settlement that affirmed FRTs as federally legal. The video also draws parallels to the bump stock ban and highlights a concerning incident of potential overreach by local authorities.

This video advocates for a strategic shift in Second Amendment advocacy, moving from an unattainable 100% win model to a more achievable 51% win model. The speaker suggests that by celebrating incremental victories, such as winning four out of seven lawsuits or legislative pushes, the gun rights movement can ensure the preservation and strengthening of constitutional rights for future generations. This approach is likened to a game of inches, emphasizing consistent progress over infrequent, overwhelming victories.

This video details the ongoing legal battle of Mark and Patricia McCloskey, who are seeking the return of their firearms five years after an incident where they emerged armed during a protest. Despite receiving a pardon for misdemeanor charges of unlawful use of a weapon, their firearms remain forfeited due to the initial guilty plea. The case highlights complex legal interpretations of pardons versus expungements and their impact on property rights, with ongoing court proceedings determining the final outcome.

The Supreme Court declined to hear a case regarding Maryland's "assault weapons" ban. However, Justice Kavanaugh indicated that similar petitions are likely to be reviewed soon. Justice Thomas emphasized the critical importance of addressing the legality of banning the AR-15, the most popular rifle in America, noting that this issue has been avoided for a decade. Gun Owners of America (GOA) is actively involved in legal battles against such bans and encourages vigilance in protecting Second Amendment rights.

The speaker argues that gun controllers are losing ground on multiple fronts, including legal battles, legislative efforts, and state-level support for concealed carry. They identify the cultural and emotional aspects of gun ownership as the 'last frontier' where gun control advocates still hold sway, but assert that this is also being challenged. The video suggests a strategic focus on the creative, emotional, and human elements of the Second Amendment movement is crucial for continued success.