Videos tagged with Legal Gun Ownership

This video details the arrest of Maddox Livingston for alleged possession of a stolen firearm, which was later proven to be legally purchased. The incident highlights potential issues within the New Roads Police Department, including the use of patent numbers instead of serial numbers for firearm checks and a lack of bodycam usage. Livingston has since filed a lawsuit against the department.

This video details a critical incident where a legal gun owner, Maddox Livingston, was wrongly arrested and charged with possessing a stolen firearm due to a police clerical error. The incident highlights systemic failures in law enforcement training and procedures, emphasizing the potential consequences of a simple mistake involving firearm identification numbers. It serves as a stark warning to all lawful gun owners about their rights and the importance of understanding the legal ramifications of traffic stops.

This video details the wrongful arrest and jailing of Maddox Livingston over a legally purchased firearm due to a police error in New Roads, Louisiana. It highlights systemic issues within the local police department, including alleged corruption, a history of misconduct by officers, and a police chief's forced resignation. The narrative underscores the importance of legal firearm ownership documentation and the potential for severe consequences when law enforcement fails to follow proper procedures.

This entry explains how certain firearms, like the Stevens Model 22-410, can be legally owned without a serial number. This exemption applies to firearms manufactured before the Gun Control Act of 1968, which mandated serial numbers on all newly produced or imported firearms. The video highlights the historical context leading to the 1968 Act and clarifies that original, pre-Act firearms without serial numbers are not subject to the same regulations as those with obliterated markings.

This video details the arrest of NFL player Rashaan Walker for declaring his legally owned firearm at LaGuardia Airport, highlighting New York's exceptionally restrictive gun laws. It explains that even when following TSA guidelines for transporting firearms (unloaded, locked, checked baggage), New York's jurisdiction can lead to arrest, treating FOPA as an affirmative defense rather than a preventative measure. The content strongly advises gun owners to avoid flying into NYC airports altogether due to the high risk of felony charges and confiscation, even for legal out-of-state owners.

This video explores the legal concept of carrying firearms, specifically addressing the premise that if an action is legal unarmed, it remains legal when armed. The content likely delves into self-defense laws, open and concealed carry regulations, and the legal justifications for being armed in public. It aims to inform viewers about their rights and the legal framework surrounding firearm possession, possibly with examples of situations where this principle applies.

This YouTube video, titled 'What You Can/Can't Do While Carrying a Firearm!?!', aims to educate viewers on the legal aspects of carrying a firearm. The description emphasizes that the answer may surprise free citizens and patriots, suggesting a focus on rights and restrictions. The video also promotes official merchandise, a backup channel, and patron support via Patreon and SubscribeStar. It features original music and artwork.

This YouTube video's title, "Should courthouses offer weapon check-in lockers?", suggests a discussion on the potential implementation of secure storage solutions for firearms in public buildings, specifically courthouses. The description indicates a live broadcast scheduled for 6 PM Pacific. The core topic revolves around the practicality and advisability of providing weapon check-in facilities to allow individuals to lawfully carry firearms to courthouses while ensuring public safety by temporarily storing them. This likely involves considerations of current laws, potential benefits, drawbacks, and public opinion on such a measure.

This video discusses firearms that are not recommended for purchase, focusing on potential reliability issues that can arise under stress rather than at the range. The presenter argues that certain firearms can lead to expensive mistakes or legal trouble, particularly by 2026, due to outdated habits or misperceptions about gun performance. The video encourages viewers to LIKE and SUBSCRIBE to reach 500,000 subscribers and provides links to their YouTube and Facebook pages.

This YouTube video, titled "Avoid THIS to stay out of jail," strongly implies a focus on legal pitfalls and potential criminal consequences related to firearms ownership or usage. While no specific firearms are mentioned in the provided title and description, the suggestive title hints at a discussion of laws, regulations, or common mistakes that could lead to legal trouble for gun owners. The description primarily consists of links to the creator's various social media and streaming platforms, indicating this might be a lifestyle or commentary channel with a potential underlying theme of firearms.

This video discusses a new law in New York that allows police to seize firearms without a warrant, even if legally owned and permitted. The description emphasizes the speed at which this change occurred and the potential implications for gun owners, urging viewers to pay attention to this significant shift in gun control policy. The content highlights a perceived erosion of gun rights and the potential for confiscation under new circumstances.

This video warns gun owners about potential firearm bans and restrictions coming in 2026. It highlights how quickly laws can change, turning commonly owned firearms into problematic items due to feature bans or transfer rule changes. The content aims to inform viewers about specific popular guns that are currently being targeted by lawmakers for potential legislation, advising them to be aware of these impending changes.