Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, argues that arming teachers and staff is a superior approach to school security compared to relying solely on armed security guards. He emphasizes that teachers and staff have the most immediate stake in protecting students and themselves, acting as their own first responders. Smith also highlights the limitations of gun-free zone signs and the potential unreliability of external security personnel in critical moments.
This video argues that firearms are the most effective deterrent against school shootings, drawing historical parallels from the founding era to modern times. It references the Parkland Report, which reportedly supports arming teachers. Constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith explains this "Defense in Depth" strategy, emphasizing individual rights and the concept of "No Duty to Protect" by law enforcement in certain situations. The video also touches upon historical gun laws and the founders' awareness of potential mass violence.
This video critically examines the aftermath of the Parkland school shooting, arguing that mainstream media and politicians have ignored crucial findings from an official report in favor of a gun control agenda. It highlights that the report recommended arming trained teachers and staff as a preventative measure. The content also questions the narrative around gun control by pointing to large settlements paid to Parkland victims' families by government entities, suggesting negligence, not just guns, was a factor. The video aims to unearth these buried solutions and offer a counter-narrative to the prevalent gun control discourse.
You've reached the end! 3 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.