Videos tagged with Penal Code 30515

Reno May provides a critical analysis of California's upcoming Assembly Bill 1263, which will effectively ban the online sale of many firearm parts and accessories starting January 1, 2026. The law broadly defines restricted items and imposes complex sales and shipping requirements. May strongly advises California residents to acquire necessary parts before the deadline due to the law's complexity and potential market withdrawal by retailers.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Miller v. Bonta decision, where Judge Benitez struck down California's assault weapon ban as unconstitutional. The speaker, an experienced legal commentator on firearms law, details the 10-day stay on enforcement and discusses the potential legal pathways forward, including Ninth Circuit review. The ruling is contextualized within recent legal precedents affecting firearm regulations.

This video details the California Department of Justice's action against Juggernaut Tactical for allegedly selling unlawful assault weapons. The CA DOJ issued a cease-and-desist letter, asserting that Juggernaut's F9, F10, and F15 rifles, designed to circumvent the state's assault weapon ban through a modified grip, are indeed assault weapons under Penal Code 30515. The video discusses the legal implications and ongoing challenges to California's firearms regulations.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Rupp v. Bonta case concerning California's assault weapon ban. The discussion details the legal challenges to both the named-model and characteristics-based bans, highlighting the strategic agreement between parties to stay proceedings pending the Supreme Court's decision in NYSRPA v. Bruen. The expert emphasizes how this stay could lead to a more efficient resolution of these critical Second Amendment cases.

This video provides an update on the class action lawsuit, Bracino v. Boneta, filed by Franklin Armory against the California Department of Justice. The lawsuit challenges the DOJ's ban on the transfer of Title 1 firearms to California residents who placed deposits before August 6, 2020. The core issue revolves around California's reclassification of 'other' firearms as 'assault weapons' via SB 118, preventing legal transfers. While the lawsuit aims to allow these transfers, it acknowledges that registered firearms would still be subject to California's assault weapon regulations.

This video provides a critical update on the registration of 'other firearms,' specifically the Franklin Armory Title 1, in California. Presented by a licensed attorney and 2A advocate, it details the legal background, the implications of SB 118, and the specific requirements for registration. The speaker offers expert analysis on the decision to register, advising caution due to increased restrictions and suggesting alternative compliance methods.

This video provides an expert analysis of the legal implications following Judge Benitez's ruling on California's assault weapons ban in the Miller v. Bonta case. It details the current status of the ban, the state's next steps in seeking a stay from the Ninth Circuit, and the critical timing of the court's proceedings relative to the expiration of the initial 30-day stay.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Miller v. Becerra case and its implications for Second Amendment rights in California. The speaker, an expert in firearms law, breaks down the legal procedures, potential timelines, and strategic appeals processes, including the possibility of a 'freedom window' if a favorable ruling is issued. The analysis covers the impact on specific firearm types and anticipates future legal challenges up to the Supreme Court.

This video provides a detailed explanation of California's magazine capacity laws, focusing on the legal definitions of large-capacity magazines and the relevant penal codes. It discusses the landmark Duncan v. Bacerra case, the concept of 'Freedom Week,' and the ongoing legal challenges to these restrictions. The presenter, a licensed attorney, clarifies common questions regarding possession, proof of purchase, and carrying these magazines.

This video from Armed Scholar, featuring a licensed attorney, delves into the legality of the Juggernaut Tactical featureless grip in California. It meticulously examines California Penal Codes 30515 and 5469 to define 'pistol grip' and 'featureless rifle,' highlighting the critical 'web of the trigger hand' placement. The discussion emphasizes the significant legal gray area surrounding grips that may be marketed as compliant but could be interpreted otherwise by law enforcement, advising viewers to prioritize unambiguous compliance for featureless builds.