Videos tagged with Postal Service

This video features an expert discussion on the current landscape of Second Amendment litigation and advocacy. It highlights optimism regarding ongoing legal battles, contrasting the current administration's stance with previous ones. The discussion points out a dichotomy between strong state-level defense of gun rights, exemplified by Harmeet Dhillon's efforts, and federal challenges from the DOJ. The DOJ's position on NFA items like suppressors and SBRs is detailed, along with GOA's strong opposition. A recent DOJ memo concerning handgun mailing via the Postal Service is also analyzed, indicating a potential shift in federal policy.

This episode of Leaf & Barrel LIVE, titled "USPS FAILS....AGAIN!!", appears to focus on issues or problems encountered with the United States Postal Service, likely in relation to firearms or firearm-related shipments. As the title suggests a recurring problem, the discussion might involve frustrations, policy critiques, or personal anecdotes related to USPS handling of packages, potentially including firearms or their components. The content's relevance to the firearms community would depend on the specific nature of the USPS failures discussed.

This video discusses the question of whether U.S. postal workers should be allowed to carry firearms. It references a federal judge's ruling in Florida that a postal worker bringing a gun to work violated Second Amendment rights. The discussion explores the practicalities and implications of arming postal workers.

This video discusses a Washington Times report detailing how the U.S. Postal Service, through its inspectors and an 'Internet Covert Operations Program' (ICOPS), surveilled Americans, including those participating in Second Amendment rallies. Records obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request revealed this surveillance occurred between September 2020 and April 2021, focusing on issues involving guns and President Biden's election. A subsequent audit by the Postal Service Inspector General found that certain surveillance activities exceeded law enforcement authority and may not have been legally authorized.