Videos tagged with Privileges and Immunities Clause

This expert-level analysis from constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith details the significant legal brief filed in the Lara v. Pennsylvania case before the US Supreme Court. The case challenges the prohibition of concealed carry for 18-20 year olds, with the 3rd Circuit ruling in favor of their Second Amendment rights. Smith also contrasts this with the Reese v. United States case, highlighting the strategic implications of federal versus state law challenges.

This video discusses the landmark case California Rifle & Pistol Association v. Luna, filed in the Central District of California. The lawsuit challenges California's restrictive concealed carry permit (CCW) process and its refusal to recognize CCW permits issued by other states. The plaintiffs argue that these policies violate constitutional rights, including the Second Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause, and the Privileges and Immunities Clause, by hindering interstate travel and discriminating against non-residents. The case seeks a preliminary injunction to halt these restrictive laws.