Videos tagged with Supreme Court Rulings

Erich Pratt, Senior Vice President of Gun Owners of America, asserts that the Supreme Court has ruled police have no legal duty to protect individuals, emphasizing citizens are their own first defenders. GOA is actively working to expand carry rights nationwide, citing a successful lawsuit against New York that permits firearm carry.

The video argues that despite common perception, gun rights are more protected today than in the 1970s and 80s. The speaker, identifying as older and knowledgeable, contrasts past social attitudes and legal interpretations with current ones, emphasizing the Supreme Court's establishment of the Second Amendment as an individual right. This shift, according to the speaker, has led to more protected rights and a 'golden age' of firearms ownership, even as anti-gun groups and media continue to promote a narrative of constant loss.

This video analyzes the political response to an assassination attempt on Donald Trump, focusing on calls for increased gun control. It highlights proposals from mainstream media and anti-gun groups, including a nationwide ban on 'assault weapons' and an expansion of the ATF's size and budget. The speaker critiques these proposals, arguing they ignore existing laws and infringe upon Second Amendment rights, citing past ATF actions being struck down by courts.

This video provides an in-depth analysis of the Supreme Court's decision to overturn Chevron deference and its potential impact on firearms law and regulation. It discusses how the ruling might affect ATF enforcement, the interpretation of gun laws, and future litigation, particularly concerning areas like assault weapon bans and NFA items. The hosts also touch upon political commentary and the evolving landscape of firearm accessory regulations.

This video features a discussion with Professor Robert Krol about his book, 'To Trust the People with Arms,' which examines the historical understanding and legal interpretation of the Second Amendment. Krol argues that the prevailing narrative of the Second Amendment being solely a militia right is a myth, supported by historical case law and the framers' intent. The conversation highlights the significance of Supreme Court decisions like Heller, McDonald, and Bruen in establishing the Second Amendment as an individual right and discusses the ongoing challenges in its application and public perception.

This video discusses a recent Illinois court ruling that an illegal immigrant cannot be prohibited from owning firearms based on their immigration status, citing the Bruin decision's emphasis on historical tradition. The speaker argues that while the ruling may be legally correct under current interpretations, it raises significant public safety concerns and highlights the need for deportation as the primary solution for illegal immigrants found with firearms. The discussion also touches upon the broader debate of who constitutes 'the people' in constitutional rights and the potential implications for citizenship.

This video analyzes recent US Supreme Court decisions and lower court rulings impacting Second Amendment rights, focusing on California's ammunition restrictions, magazine capacity limits, and assault weapon bans. It discusses how the Supreme Court's decision in *New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. Bruen* is influencing lower courts to re-evaluate existing gun laws based on historical tradition. The content highlights the legal arguments from both gun rights advocates and gun control organizations regarding the interpretation and application of these laws.

This video discusses ongoing legal battles concerning firearms regulations in California and Illinois, focusing on challenges to assault weapons bans and magazine capacity restrictions. It highlights the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals' decisions and the complexities of these cases, particularly the Miller v. Bonta and Duncan v. Bonta cases, and their potential impact on Second Amendment rights. The discussion emphasizes the legal strategies employed by both gun rights advocates and state authorities.

This video details the legal landscape surrounding Second Amendment rights following the Supreme Court's Bruin decision. It highlights how lower courts are interpreting and challenging existing federal and state gun laws, particularly concerning individuals subject to domestic violence restraining orders, those with non-violent felony convictions, and individuals under 21. The analysis focuses on the historical tradition test established by Bruin and the ongoing legal battles that could reshape gun control in the United States.

The speaker expresses frustration with YouTube's evolving firearms regulations, which have led to the removal of numerous gun reviews and restrictions on content. This has forced a shift towards discussing Second Amendment issues, industry news, and spiritual content, despite a personal preference for creating gun reviews and filming firearms. The channel aims to disseminate important information that may not be readily available elsewhere.

This video discusses recent legislative actions and court decisions impacting firearm rights in the US. It covers the House's approval of a red flag bill, the potential for an assault weapons ban, and the Supreme Court's ruling on New York's concealed carry law. The content highlights the ongoing political and legal debates surrounding gun control measures and Second Amendment interpretations.

The Department of Justice is appealing two significant Second Amendment victories. The Daniels case ruling stated that prohibiting marijuana users from owning firearms is unconstitutional, and the Tedar case affirmed that butterfly knives are protected under the Second Amendment. These appeals indicate the DOJ's strong opposition to these rulings, which could have broad implications for federal gun control.