Videos tagged with Third Circuit Ruling

The Trump DOJ's decision not to appeal the Third Circuit's ruling in the Brian Range case is a significant development for Second Amendment rights. This ruling, which found that non-violent felons cannot be permanently disarmed, now stands as precedent. The administration appears to be shifting towards an administrative restoration of rights program, moving away from the ATF due to funding restrictions.

This video from Washington Gun Law provides an expert-level analysis of the 'Range v. Attorney General' case, a significant Second Amendment ruling from the Third Circuit. The discussion, led by an expert with 26 years of experience, clarifies the implications for non-violent felons seeking to restore their firearm rights, contrasting it with the 'Rahimi' decision and highlighting the narrow scope of the current ruling while acknowledging its far-reaching potential impact.

This video provides an expert-level analysis of the Third Circuit's en banc ruling in Range v. Garland, which declared federal law prohibiting non-violent individuals with felony or misdemeanor convictions from possessing firearms unconstitutional as applied. The ruling, authored by Judge Hardiman and joined by Biden-appointed judges, directly challenges the government's interpretation of the Second Amendment post-Bruen, emphasizing that the government failed to demonstrate historical tradition supporting such broad prohibitions. The decision is limited to an 'as-applied' challenge but opens avenues for similar legal actions.