This video analyzes the Fifth Circuit's decision in United States v. Diaz, arguing it incorrectly applied Second Amendment precedent. The speaker, a constitutional attorney, critiques the court's reliance on historical horse thievery laws as an analogue for disarming felons convicted of vehicle theft, asserting the court failed to place the burden of proof on the government and cited insufficient historical precedents. The analysis highlights the distinction between historical laws and modern interpretations of dangerousness.
You've reached the end! 1 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.