This video discusses a significant Supreme Court ruling (8-1 decision) in favor of the First Amendment's protection of free speech, specifically in the context of licensed professionals. The case involved a Colorado law that restricted a mental health counselor's ability to advise clients against gender transition. The Supreme Court, in an opinion authored by Justice Gorsuch, affirmed that professional licensing does not negate an individual's right to free speech, particularly when the state attempts to enforce viewpoint discrimination. This ruling has broad implications for various professions, including those who advocate for Second Amendment rights.
The US Supreme Court unanimously ruled 9-0 in NRA v. Vullo, affirming that government officials cannot coerce private parties to suppress disfavored speech. This decision, authored by Justice Sonia Sotomayor, establishes that 'guidance letters' used by entities like New York State to pressure financial institutions against gun-related businesses can be considered evidence of First Amendment violations. The ruling is seen as a significant win for gun rights organizations and a blow to bureaucratic overreach.
This video discusses the Supreme Court case NRA v. Vullo, focusing on allegations that New York state officials, under Governor Andrew Cuomo, used regulatory power to coerce financial institutions into cutting ties with the NRA. The core of the argument centers on whether this constitutes a First Amendment violation of free speech and viewpoint discrimination. The discussion highlights the NRA's claim that threats were used over persuasion, while the state argued it was enforcing the law due to the NRA's alleged illegal conduct.
This video discusses the legal defense of selective prosecution, arguing that the Biden administration's Department of Justice and ATF are targeting conservatives and Second Amendment supporters while overlooking similar actions by liberals. It highlights court cases where judges have recognized this pattern of viewpoint discrimination, citing examples involving political rallies, January 6th defendants, and even chalk messages. The speaker, Mark Smith, a constitutional attorney, encourages viewers to understand and potentially utilize this defense.
This video discusses a significant First Amendment case, NRA v. Vullo, before the US Supreme Court. The case stems from allegations that New York State misused its regulatory powers to target the NRA due to its political and constitutional stances. Surprisingly, the ACLU has announced it will represent the NRA in this crucial legal battle. Constitutional attorney Mark Smith breaks down the situation, explaining viewpoint discrimination and how the ACLU's involvement could impact the NRA's chances before the Supreme Court. The discussion is framed within the context of defending American liberties, referencing the 'four boxes' of liberty.
This video from CRPA TV details a lawsuit filed by B&L Productions against California's statewide ban on gun shows at fairgrounds, challenging SB 264 and AB 893. The lawsuit, supported by the California Rifle & Pistol Association, argues these bans constitute viewpoint discrimination and violate First, Second, and Fourteenth Amendment rights, citing precedents from previous legal victories. The expert analysis highlights the legal strategy against legislative claims of public safety.
You've reached the end! 6 videos loaded.
Gun Laws by State
Read firearms regulations for all 50 states + D.C.
Find Gun Dealers
Search licensed FFL dealers near you.