Gavin Newsom Signs Law Releasing Gun Owner Private Information!!!

This video from Copper Jacket TV, featuring expert Will, details California's new 'three-per-month' firearm and precursor parts purchase limit (AB 1078) taking effect April 1st. Will critically analyzes the law's constitutionality, referencing the 9th Circuit's prior ruling against rationing, and anticipates legal challenges. He also highlights Attorneys On Retainer as a sponsor for self-defense legal needs.

This entry details Colorado's Senate Bill 26-043, which proposes significant restrictions on the sale and transfer of firearm barrels, mirroring California's legislative approach. The bill mandates that all firearm barrel sales or transfers must be conducted in person by a Federally Licensed Firearm Dealer (FFL), requiring extensive record-keeping of the buyer's identification and the barrel's specifications. Supporters claim it's to curb ghost guns, while critics argue it's a data-harvesting operation targeting law-abiding gun owners and hobbyists.

This video provides a critical analysis of California's SB 948, a significant gun control bill introduced for the 2026 legislative session. The speaker, with extensive experience in firearms legislation, details how the bill aims to expand Firearm Safety Certificate (FSC) requirements, mandating eight hours of training including live-fire. It also imposes new reporting obligations on new California residents and shifts training costs to individuals, potentially creating practical barriers to firearm ownership and training. The speaker urges viewers to contact legislators in opposition.

This video explains the 'Vampire Rule,' a gun control measure requiring businesses to grant explicit permission for concealed carry permit holders to enter. The discussion highlights the differences between California's unique 'guns allowed' sign requirement and the more common approach in states like Hawaii, New York, New Jersey, and Maryland, which also permit affirmative consent. The Ninth Circuit's ruling against California's rule suggests a path for states to implement similar restrictions if they align with the less restrictive models.

Olympian Kim Rhode discusses the Rhode v. Bonta case at the Ninth Circuit, highlighting how legal challenges in California aim to restrict ammunition purchases. She emphasizes the importance of fighting for Second Amendment rights to prevent such restrictions from spreading nationwide, expressing pride in representing the industry.

This video discusses Glock's announcement to cease production of most models, excluding slimlines, and introduce the 'Series V' line. The speaker, an authoritative voice in the firearms community, speculates that this shift is driven by issues with 'Glock switches' and California's new gun law, urging Glock for greater transparency with consumers.

This video provides an expert analysis of the Supreme Court's denial of certiorari in Torcivia v. Suffolk County. The speaker, an authority on Second Amendment litigation, explains how the Second Circuit's ruling allows for warrantless firearm seizures under the 'special needs exception,' despite the Supreme Court's prior decision in Caniglia v. Strom. The denial means this precedent stands, potentially impacting future firearm rights cases.

This expert analysis from Armed Scholar details the Supreme Court's 5-4 emergency order concerning Texas's border dispute with the Biden administration. The ruling allows federal agents to cut concertina wire while the case proceeds, impacting Texas's claim to a constitutional right of self-defense against invasion. The case is remanded for further factual development.

The Supreme Court denied a stay for Missouri's Second Amendment Preservation Act (SAPA), which aimed to prevent state agents from enforcing federal gun laws deemed unconstitutional. The 8-1 decision, with Justice Thomas dissenting, leaves the future of SAPA uncertain, though a statement from Justices Gorsuch and Alito suggests private enforcement mechanisms might still be viable. This ruling has significant implications for state-level attempts to counter federal firearm regulations.

This video details a critical U.S. Supreme Court emergency election order concerning Pennsylvania's handling of provisional ballots. The Supreme Court denied an emergency request to stay a Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that mandated the counting of provisional ballots for voters whose mail-in ballots were deemed invalid. The RNC argued this usurped the state legislature's role and constituted impermissible 'ballot curing.' Justice Alito's opinion noted the limited scope of the lower court's judgment.