Gavin Newsom Signs Law Releasing Gun Owner Private Information!!!

Published on January 17, 2022
Duration: 8:13

This video, presented by an expert Second Amendment attorney, details the implications of California's AB 173, signed by Gavin Newsom, which allows private gun owner information to be shared with research centers and non-profits. A lawsuit, Doe v. Bonta, has been filed challenging the law's constitutionality, arguing it violates privacy, Second Amendment, and due process rights, and creates a chilling effect on firearm ownership. The video highlights the support from organizations like USCCA and the Firearms Policy Coalition in this legal battle.

Quick Summary

California's AB 173, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, allows private gun owner information to be shared with research centers and non-profits, sparking the Doe v. Bonta lawsuit. This legal challenge argues the bill violates privacy, Second Amendment, and due process rights, creating a 'chilling effect' on firearm ownership by exposing personal data previously protected.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Lawsuit Against Newsom & AB 173
  2. 00:16USCCA & FPC Support
  3. 01:19CA Firearm Purchase Records
  4. 02:06AB 173 Data Disclosure Details
  5. 02:54Doe v. Bonta Lawsuit Filing
  6. 03:35Legal Claims & Privacy Violation
  7. 04:19Chilling Effect & Rights Violation
  8. 05:02Due Process Arguments
  9. 05:45Transferring Doe Case Details

Frequently Asked Questions

What is California Bill AB 173 about?

California Bill AB 173, signed by Governor Gavin Newsom, allows private information of gun owners, including personal details and firearm purchase records, to be shared with research centers like UC Davis and certain non-profits for academic and violence prevention studies.

What is the Doe v. Bonta lawsuit?

Doe v. Bonta is a lawsuit filed against California's AB 173, alleging that the bill violates gun owners' privacy, Second Amendment, and due process rights by enabling the disclosure of their personal and firearm data to non-law enforcement entities.

How does AB 173 affect gun owner privacy?

AB 173 significantly impacts gun owner privacy by making detailed records, previously assured to be for law enforcement use only, available for academic research and non-profit studies, potentially leading to misuse and security concerns.

What is the 'chilling effect' mentioned regarding AB 173?

The 'chilling effect' refers to the potential outcome where law-abiding citizens may refrain from purchasing firearms due to fears that their private information will be disclosed, thus infringing upon their Second Amendment rights.

Related News

All News →

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from Armed Scholar

View all →