Senators Guilty of Treason?...Legal Risks of Carrying .44mag vs. 9mm? (INSIDE GUNS w/TYM S2:E3)

Published on January 7, 2021
Duration: 16:39

The video discusses the legal definitions of sedition and treason in the context of senatorial objections to election results. It clarifies that objecting to votes and demanding evidence is not inherently seditious or treasonous, as Congress has a right to debate and have concerns addressed. However, rejecting electors without verifiable evidence would constitute sedition. The speaker also addresses concerns about carrying a .44 Magnum versus a 9mm, stating that caliber choice is less critical than the circumstances of a self-defense incident.

Quick Summary

Objecting to election results and requesting evidence is not sedition or treason. Congress has the right to debate and have concerns addressed. Sedition could occur if electors are rejected without verifiable evidence, attempting to overturn a legitimate outcome without proof.

Chapters

  1. 00:17Introduction & Viewer Emails
  2. 00:30Addressing Election Objections
  3. 01:32Sedition vs. Legitimate Objection
  4. 03:37Defining Sedition and Treason
  5. 04:03The Role of Evidence in Objections
  6. 05:03Ballot Signatures and Privacy Laws
  7. 06:06When Objections Become Sedition
  8. 06:30The Courts' Role in Verification
  9. 07:05Taking a Deep Breath on Election Issues
  10. 07:47Transition to Gun Talk
  11. 07:52Viewer Email: .44 Magnum vs. 9mm
  12. 08:32Caliber and Legal Ramifications
  13. 09:10Prosecution Arguments: Ammo Count
  14. 09:46Circumstance is Key in Self-Defense
  15. 10:16Best Advice for Self-Defense
  16. 11:15Personal Carry Choice: .44 Magnum
  17. 11:35.44 Magnum vs. Semi-Auto Rounds
  18. 12:00TYM Triple P Program Update
  19. 13:04Viewer EDC: John H.
  20. 13:13Featured EDC: .44 Magnum Setup
  21. 14:48Conclusion on .44 Magnum Carry
  22. 14:51Show Outro & Support
  23. 15:07Support the Channel: Patreon
  24. 15:45Final Thoughts on the State of the World

Frequently Asked Questions

Can objecting to election results be considered sedition or treason?

Objecting to election results and requesting evidence is not sedition or treason. Congress has the right to debate and have concerns addressed. Sedition could occur if electors are rejected without verifiable evidence, attempting to overturn a legitimate outcome without proof.

What is the legal risk of carrying a .44 Magnum versus a 9mm?

In a self-defense situation, the caliber of the firearm is less critical than the circumstances. A firearm is a deadly weapon regardless of its specific power. The key legal factor is whether the use of force was justified by a reasonable fear for your life.

Can the amount of ammunition carried be used against someone in court?

Prosecutors might argue that carrying a large quantity of ammunition (e.g., 60 rounds of 9mm) or a powerful caliber (.44 Magnum) suggests an intent to cause mass harm. However, the success of such arguments is doubtful if the self-defense situation was justified.

What is the most important factor in a self-defense legal case?

The most important factor is the justification of the self-defense incident itself. If the shooting was a 'good shoot' based on a reasonable fear for your life, the caliber of the firearm or the amount of ammunition carried will likely be of secondary importance.

More 2nd Amendment & Law Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →