Shenanigans in the 9th Circuit ... Again

The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals is reportedly defying the Supreme Court's directives by maintaining California's ban on 'assault weapons' in the Miller v. Bonta case. The court has placed Miller on hold, awaiting a ruling in Duncan v. Bonta (magazine ban), a decision that itself faced procedural irregularities. Expert analysis suggests the 9th Circuit panel exhibits bias and a lack of technical understanding regarding firearms, indicating a prolonged legal battle likely to return to the Supreme Court.

This video details a significant Second Amendment victory in the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals concerning California's open carry ban. The court ruled the ban unconstitutional, citing a lack of historical precedent for such restrictions and highlighting California's 'subterfuge' in licensing. Expert analysis from Mark W. Smith, a constitutional attorney, emphasizes the strategic legal impact of this ruling, positioning California's law as an outlier. The historical context of open carry and the racially motivated Mulford Act of 1967 are also discussed.

This entry details the legal proceedings surrounding California's 'assault weapon' ban, specifically the Miller v. Bonta case. It highlights Judge Benitez's role, the impact of the Bruen decision, and the upcoming hearing on August 29th, 2023, which could significantly affect the ban's enforcement. The information is presented from the perspective of an experienced firearms instructor and SEO strategist, emphasizing the legal and procedural aspects of the case.

This WGL AM episode, hosted by William Kirk, Hannah Hill, and Kostas Moros, provides an expert-level analysis of recent legal developments impacting the Second Amendment. The discussion centers on oral arguments for United States v. Hemani and recaps significant upcoming and recently decided cases like Duncan v. Bonta and Miller v. Bonta, focusing on their implications for magazine capacity and assault weapon bans. The team also examines challenges to PLCAA workarounds and potential economic impacts on the firearms industry.

This video from Four Boxes Diner, featuring constitutional attorney Mark W. Smith, discusses a significant development in Second Amendment law. The US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit has issued an order to stay deliberations in the Miller v. Bonta case, which challenged California's ban on semi-automatic rifles. Judge Benitez had previously ruled this ban unconstitutional. The video breaks down the implications of this delay, arguing it makes little sense and may indicate a strategic maneuver. The content emphasizes the importance of understanding the "four boxes" of American liberty to defend constitutional rights.

This video provides an expert-level breakdown of the Ninth Circuit's decision to grant California an emergency stay on Judge Benitez's ruling that struck down the state's 'assault weapon' ban. The speaker, an experienced firearms instructor and legal analyst, details the case's progression, including Judge Benitez's initial findings and California's subsequent appeal. The analysis highlights the legal reasoning behind the Ninth Circuit's stay, potential implications for future Second Amendment cases, and identifies 'silver linings' for gun owners despite the temporary setback.

This guide, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, outlines tactical and legal considerations for drivers encountering mob situations. It emphasizes de-escalation, identifying escape routes, and understanding the legal thresholds for self-defense, particularly the distinction between property damage and threats to human life. Kirk, a legal instructor, stresses the importance of restraint and lawful action.

This video, presented by William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, explores the complex legal question of whether one can legally shoot back at police if they are unlawfully firing. Kirk emphasizes that while a legal right to self-defense against imminent threats of death or serious bodily harm exists, the decision to use lethal force, especially against law enforcement, involves significant tactical and legal considerations beyond mere legality. The discussion highlights foundational self-defense principles and specific legal doctrines like the Castle Doctrine and Stand Your Ground.

This video, featuring William Kirk of Washington Gun Law, details how sheriffs in Arkansas are pushing back against federal gun control measures, particularly the ATF's pistol brace rule. It highlights Arkansas Act 1012 and state code 21-1-904, which aim to prevent state and local officials from enforcing federal firearms regulations deemed unconstitutional infringements on Second Amendment rights. The Arkansas Sheriff's Association has officially stated their non-support for enforcing such rules, prioritizing focus on violent offenders.

William Kirk from Washington Gun Law clarifies that the ATF cannot demand inspection of non-NFA firearms without a warrant. While NFA ownership doesn't waive Fourth Amendment rights, FFLs are subject to annual inspections, a rule not applicable to private individuals. If ATF agents arrive without a warrant, consent is typically required, and politely declining is advised.