December 2018 Q&A

Published on December 28, 2018
Duration: 45:10

This Q&A episode from InRangeTV addresses viewer questions primarily concerning the channel's funding model, specifically their reliance on Patreon. The host explains the rationale behind moving away from YouTube's Adsense model to direct viewer support, emphasizing the stability and predictability it offers for content creation and operational expenses. The discussion also touches upon the importance of decentralizing funding sources to mitigate single points of failure, though viable alternatives to Patreon are noted as currently lacking.

Quick Summary

InRangeTV utilizes Patreon for viewer-funded support, citing its stability and predictability over traditional advertising models. This direct support enables consistent content creation and operational planning. The channel emphasizes the importance of decentralizing funding sources to avoid single points of failure, though viable alternatives to Patreon are currently lacking.

Chapters

  1. 00:03Introduction & Patreon Questions
  2. 00:47Why InRangeTV Moved from Adsense to Patreon
  3. 01:15Patreon vs. Adsense: Stability & Predictability
  4. 02:30Benefits of Direct Viewer Support Model
  5. 02:57Decentralization of Content and Funding
  6. 03:44Patreon Controversy & Single Point of Failure
  7. 04:03Searching for Patreon Alternatives
  8. 04:20Issues with SubscribeStar
  9. 04:46Avoiding Knee-Jerk Reactions in Funding Models
  10. 05:14Consequences of Leaving YouTube or Patreon
  11. 05:26Commitment to Patreon Until Viable Alternatives Emerge
  12. 05:51Why Mail-In Support Isn't a Solution
  13. 06:36Summary: Viable Alternatives Needed
  14. 06:52M1 Garand Chambering: .308 vs. .30-06
  15. 07:23New Old West Vignettes & Underground Railroad Projects
  16. 08:02SKS with AKM Mags: Viability as Modern Carbine
  17. 08:41Shot Show Attendance
  18. 08:57Monopod on Mag vs. Hasty Sling
  19. 09:49Favorite Cocktail: Old-World Sazerac
  20. 11:07Cybernetic Augmentations & Transhumanism
  21. 13:06Future Tasting History Videos
  22. 13:23Arm Brace Use in Two Gun Action Challenge
  23. 14:019mm Double Stack Polymer vs. 1911
  24. 14:55Worst Injury Sustained During a Match
  25. 15:53Requiring Individual First Aid Kits (IFAKs)
  26. 16:49Stoner 63 Platformer Concept: Deserves More R&D?
  27. 17:55Walther P38 vs. Browning Hi-Power
  28. 19:30Modernizing a Lever-Action Rifle
  29. 20:33Best Pistol Caliber Carbine for Competition
  30. 21:05Colt Walker Revolver in .45-60
  31. 21:52Weapon Choice for Red October Match
  32. 23:03Crimping Gas Tube to Fix Overgassing
  33. 24:13Overall Goal in Competition: Knowledge vs. Winning
  34. 25:06Trijicon ACOG Fixed Power vs. Variable Optics
  35. 25:53Finnish Brutality 2019 & AR-15 Dominance
  36. 26:35The Concept of a Military Omni-Gun
  37. 27:15Reloading for High Power: Accuracy Factors
  38. 28:39Fixed Power Magnified Optic vs. No Optic
  39. 28:51Zeroing Magnifier Behind Red Dot
  40. 29:28Future of Crypto Wars: Cryptocurrency
  41. 30:05BDC Reticle vs. Simple Crosshair in Competition
  42. 30:59Watching Forgotten Weapons
  43. 31:16Competing in Two Gun Matches with SKS
  44. 31:50Envy of Ian's Firearms Experiences
  45. 32:21InRangeTV's Firearms Content Quality
  46. 32:48Suppressors and Firearm Accuracy
  47. 33:26Merwin & Hulbert Revolvers vs. Colt SAA
  48. 34:13Cap and Ball Revolver Carry in Poland
  49. 35:14Digital Rifle Scopes: Future Potential
  50. 35:47M1 Garand Ammunition: Pressure & Op-Rod Speed
  51. 37:07High-Powered Pellet Guns for Two Gun Matches
  52. 37:45Tips for Stopping Glasses from Fogging
  53. 38:08HBO/Netflix Series Ideas: Old West Figures
  54. 41:20Marlin/Colt Burgess Rifles for Lever Gun Project
  55. 42:407.62 NATO Battle Rifle Choice: SCAR-H vs. G3
  56. 43:18Kel-Tec RDB Bullpup Ejection System
  57. 44:16Conclusion & Patreon Support

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does InRangeTV use Patreon for funding?

InRangeTV uses Patreon to provide a stable and predictable monthly income, which is crucial for planning operational expenses and content creation projects like attending industry events or filming matches. This direct viewer support model offers more financial stability than traditional advertising revenue.

What are the benefits of decentralizing content funding?

Decentralizing funding, by not relying solely on one platform like Patreon, mitigates the risk of a single point of failure. This protects content creators from potential issues arising from platform policy changes, technical failures, or external pressures, ensuring continued operation.

Are there viable alternatives to Patreon for content creators?

While InRangeTV actively seeks alternatives to Patreon, none have yet proven to be sufficiently viable, trustworthy, or stable. The channel emphasizes that any transition would require careful vetting, and knee-jerk reactions to platform controversies are not a wise strategy.

Can sending money via mail be a reliable funding source for content creators?

No, sending money via mail is not a dependable funding solution for content creators. Unlike subscription-based platforms that offer automatic monthly cycles, mail-in donations are unpredictable and cannot be relied upon for consistent financial planning and operational sustainability.

More General Videos You Might Like

More from InRangeTV

View all →