I've Never Seen This Before! (Insane Ammo Shortage)

This video highlights the overwhelming popularity and critical supply chain vulnerabilities of the 9mm caliber. It emphasizes that civilian access to 9mm ammunition is heavily influenced by law enforcement and military demand, which receive priority during shortages. The speaker, an instructor, urges viewers to understand these dynamics to ensure their preparedness.

This YouTube video offers a strategic approach to building an ammunition stockpile, moving away from the panicked buying seen in previous years. The creator emphasizes a steady, methodical method for acquiring ammunition, likening it to building a retirement fund. The video aims to guide viewers on how to efficiently and affordably grow their ammo reserves without resorting to overpaying or frantic searches, promoting a smarter way for responsible gun owners to maintain their supplies.

The video discusses 9mm NATO ammunition, equating it to 124-grain +P loads with specific construction features. It notes that Winchester's specific NATO information is not detailed and suggests consulting John Boloney Jr. for further insights.

The PRO GUN channel host, demonstrating high authority, explains that reloading .357 Magnum ammunition is worthwhile, not primarily for initial cost savings, but for ensuring a consistent supply during potential ammo shortages. He highlights his preparedness during the COVID-19 pandemic, noting a substantial inventory of primers sufficient for approximately 50,000 rounds.

This video's title suggests a humorous or attention-grabbing approach to a topic related to firearms. The phrase "Would you pole dance for ammo?" implies a discussion about the current cost or scarcity of ammunition, possibly leading into personal anecdotes or a creative way to illustrate a point about acquiring ammunition. The mention of "My shirt story" indicates a personal narrative, likely connected to the theme of acquiring ammunition or a related experience.

This YouTube video explores the question of whether .357 Magnum ammunition can be used in a shotgun. It delves into the compatibility and potential implications of such a combination, aiming to educate viewers on firearms and ammunition types. The content is likely to be of interest to firearm enthusiasts seeking to understand ammunition cross-compatibility and firearm functionalities.

This video rigorously tests the self-defense capabilities of various airguns against a realistic human head ballistic target. The expert instructor demonstrates that low-power BB guns like the Daisy Red Rider offer minimal threat, while even full-auto CO2 BB guns fail to penetrate the skull. However, a high-velocity Gamo pellet rifle proves capable of causing significant damage, cracking the skull. The instructor concludes that BB guns are unsuitable for self-defense, and while pellet rifles are dangerous, they lack the immediate stopping power of conventional firearms.

This video tests the BulletSafe VP3 Level IIIA vest against various calibers up to .44 Magnum using a realistic human torso dummy. While the vest stopped all tested rounds, including a .44 Magnum and 12-gauge buckshot, significant backface deformation and blunt force trauma were evident, especially with higher-energy rounds. The dummy's shoulder blade was broken by buckshot, and severe bruising was indicated by the .44 Magnum impact.

This review of the Crosman DPMS SBR full-auto BB gun highlights its realistic AR-15 SBR aesthetics and select-fire capability. The host demonstrates its operation, including loading with a speedloader and the dual CO2 power system. Performance metrics like 1400 RPM and 430 FPS are discussed, along with its accuracy and destructive potential on targets like watermelons. The device is recommended for realistic training or plinking where live firearms are impractical.

This video tests the effectiveness and dangers of using a flare gun for self-defense. While a flare gun can ignite materials and cause internal damage to a ballistic torso, its single-shot capacity, slow reload, and high risk of starting fires make it an irresponsible and dangerous choice for defense. The test highlights the unpredictable nature and significant fire hazard associated with using flare guns in a defensive scenario.