Lindner's Improbable Tube-Fed Striker-Fired Caseless Ammo Revolver

Published on December 6, 2021
Duration: 13:12

This video examines Edward Lindner's innovative, yet impractical, 1857 proof-of-concept revolver. It features a unique tube-fed, striker-fired, self-priming mechanism designed for caseless .48 caliber ammunition. While demonstrating advanced concepts like automatic percussion cap feeding and modular magazine potential, the design was too complex and expensive for its time and lacked functional firing capability.

Quick Summary

Edward Lindner's 1857 revolver was a proof-of-concept featuring a tube-fed, striker-fired mechanism for .48 caliber caseless ammunition. It included an automatic percussion cap feed and modular magazine potential but was non-functional due to design flaws like a short striker.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to the Lindner Revolver
  2. 00:28Edward Lindner's Background
  3. 00:58Mechanical Overview
  4. 01:45Ammunition and Capacity
  5. 02:31Proof-of-Concept Limitations
  6. 03:30Internal Feeding Mechanism
  7. 05:58Percussion Cap Magazine
  8. 08:20Modular Magazine Potential
  9. 10:21Historical Context and Other Patents

Frequently Asked Questions

What made Edward Lindner's 1857 revolver design unique?

Lindner's design was unique for its time, featuring a tube-fed, striker-fired mechanism for caseless ammunition. It also incorporated an automatic percussion cap feed system and a modular magazine concept, aiming for advanced functionality.

Why was the Lindner revolver considered a proof-of-concept and not a functional firearm?

The specific model examined was a proof-of-concept because it was non-functional. Key issues included a striker too short to ignite primers and a barrel secured only by a set screw, incapable of withstanding firing pressures.

What caliber and capacity did Lindner's revolver utilize?

The revolver was designed for .48 caliber caseless combustible cartridges. Its tube magazine held nine rounds, feeding into a six-shot cylinder, with potential for significantly higher capacity using multiple magazine tubes.

What were the main limitations preventing Lindner's design from military adoption?

Lindner's design was likely too complex and expensive to manufacture for military contracts. Its intricate mechanisms and proof-of-concept limitations meant it wasn't a practical, reliable firearm for widespread use.

Related News

All News →

More Gunsmithing & DIY Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →