FG42 vs M1 Garand: 2-Gun Action Match

Published on January 19, 2014
Duration: 12:44

This 2-Gun Action Challenge pits the WWII-era FG42 against the M1 Garand, highlighting their historical rivalry and performance differences. The FG42, equipped with a ZF4 scope and 20-round magazine, demonstrated superior speed in long-range stages, while the M1 Garand's capacity and sight limitations were apparent. Despite its age, the FG42's recoil management and optic proved advantageous, allowing Karl Kasarda to achieve a high overall ranking.

Quick Summary

In a 2-Gun Action Challenge, the FG42 generally outperformed the M1 Garand due to its 20-round magazine and ZF4 optic, excelling in long-range stages. While the optic's narrow field of view was a challenge up close, the FG42's recoil management was noted as comparable to modern rifles.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Intro: FG42 vs M1 Garand Rematch
  2. 01:22Stage 1: Pistol Under Table & Rifle Through Tube
  3. 02:28Stage 2: Long Range Pistol & Rifle Plates
  4. 04:36Analysis: ZF4 Scope Limitations
  5. 06:18Stage 3: Long Range Rifle Targets
  6. 08:40Stage 4: High-Speed Run and Gun
  7. 09:22Conclusion: FG42 Recoil & M1 Garand Limits

Frequently Asked Questions

How did the FG42 perform against the M1 Garand in a 2-Gun Action Match?

The FG42, equipped with a ZF4 scope and 20-round magazine, generally outperformed the M1 Garand in speed, especially in longer stages. Its optic provided a significant advantage at distance, and its recoil management was noted as comparable to modern rifles.

What were the main advantages of the FG42 in the competition?

The FG42's primary advantages were its 20-round magazine capacity, the ZF4 4x power optic which aided in long-range shooting, and its effective muzzle brake contributing to manageable recoil, making it faster in several stages.

What were the limitations of the M1 Garand in this 2-Gun Action Match?

The M1 Garand's main limitations were its 8-round capacity, requiring more frequent reloads, and its iron sights, which were less advantageous than the FG42's optic for longer-range targets. Its overall speed was slower in most stages.

How did the ZF4 scope on the FG42 affect performance?

The ZF4 scope offered good optical quality but had a very narrow field of view. This was beneficial for long-range precision but made rapid target acquisition difficult at closer distances (around 50 yards), requiring careful transitions.

More Range & Competition Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →