.38 Special VS Ice Bucket Challenge - 125gr 158gr

This YouTube video presents a challenge comparing the power of two popular revolver calibers: the .357 Magnum and the .38 Special. The title explicitly states the comparison, indicating a likely analysis of ballistic performance and practical differences between the two ammunition types.

This video compares .357 Magnum and .38 Special ammunition using a tactical lever-action rifle. The host demonstrates that visually, the rounds are nearly identical, and challenges viewers to distinguish them by shooting performance alone. The demonstration highlights noticeable differences in recoil and muzzle report, even when fired from the same rifle.

This video compares the noise and recoil levels of the .357 Magnum and .38 Special cartridges. It's presented as a follow-up to a previous video about a Henry SPD HUSH firearm, with a link provided. The comparison aims to give viewers a direct understanding of the auditory and physical differences between these two popular revolver calibers, likely through an indoor shooting test.

This YouTube video showcases a new Smith & Wesson Model 686+ revolver, specifically the 'Spec R' variant, equipped with an Aimpoint red dot sight. The description promotes the channel's merchandise and provides links to backup channels, Patreon, and SubscribeStar for fan support. It also credits the original score composer and artwork designer.

This YouTube video, titled 'Qual é o alcance de um .38 Special?' (What is the range of a .38 Special?), aims to educate viewers on the effective range of the .38 Special ammunition. While the description is minimal, the title clearly indicates a focus on the ballistics and practical limitations of this common handgun caliber, likely exploring factors that influence its maximum effective distance for various applications. The content is expected to be of interest to handgun owners, firearm enthusiasts, and those interested in self-defense or sport shooting.

This YouTube video aims to answer the question of how far one can effectively shoot a .38 Special cartridge. While the description is brief, the title clearly indicates a focus on the ballistic capabilities and practical range limitations of this common handgun caliber, likely involving discussions about accuracy, bullet drop, and terminal ballistics at various distances.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.