4 Guns We Don't Like (with Ian McCollum and Nathaniel F.)

Published on September 3, 2015
Duration: 11:15

Ian McCollum and Nathaniel F. critically assess four firearms they personally dislike: the HK91, Kel-Tec KSG, Springfield XD, and IWI Tavor. They highlight specific ergonomic and functional issues, such as the HK91's length of pull and safety, the KSG's lack of a hand stop, the XD's slide design, and the Tavor's awkward handling, emphasizing that personal preference significantly impacts firearm satisfaction despite technical merit.

Quick Summary

Firearms historian Ian McCollum and TFB's Nathaniel F. critique the HK91, Kel-Tec KSG, Springfield XD, and IWI Tavor. They highlight ergonomic flaws like the HK91's long LOP, the KSG's safety concerns, the XD's slide design, and the Tavor's awkward handling, concluding that personal fit and feel are paramount in firearm selection.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction of Disliked Firearms
  2. 00:45Heckler & Koch HK91 Critique
  3. 02:45Kel-Tec KSG Critique
  4. 04:20Springfield XD / HS2000 Critique
  5. 06:37IWI Tavor Critique
  6. 10:00Conclusion and Personal Preference

Frequently Asked Questions

Why do Ian McCollum and Nathaniel F. dislike the Heckler & Koch HK91?

Despite its advanced roller-delayed blowback system, they find the HK91's ergonomics problematic, citing a long length of pull, bulky handling, a poor trigger, and an awkward safety selector, making it uncomfortable for some shooters, especially left-handers.

What are the main criticisms of the Kel-Tec KSG shotgun?

Concerns include Kel-Tec's inconsistent quality control and the shotgun's 'schizophrenic' design. Critically, the lack of an integral hand stop on the pump poses a safety risk, potentially allowing a hand to slip in front of the muzzle during rapid cycling.

What makes the Springfield XD and IWI Tavor firearms disliked by the presenters?

The Springfield XD is criticized for its top-heavy slide increasing perceived recoil and less refined ergonomics. The IWI Tavor is deemed rear-heavy and awkward, with a less positive safety selector and higher optic mounting than preferred.

What is the overall takeaway regarding personal firearm preference?

The discussion emphasizes that even technically sound firearms can be disliked due to individual ergonomic needs and personal preferences, highlighting that fit and feel are as crucial as performance metrics for shooter satisfaction.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from TFB TV

View all →