Best Full Size Pistol Sig P320 RXP VS Glock 17 MOS

Published on March 16, 2021
Duration: 16:21

This video provides a detailed comparison between the Sig Sauer P320 RXP XFull and the Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS, focusing on their design, feel, and performance on the range. The presenter highlights key differences in ergonomics, trigger characteristics, and recoil impulse, offering insights for potential buyers trying to decide between these two popular full-size pistols.

Quick Summary

When comparing the Sig P320 RXP XFull and Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS, the Sig offers a slightly better ergonomic feel for some, with a softer trigger break. The Glock is known for its extreme reliability and vast aftermarket support, with a crisper trigger response. Both are excellent full-size pistols, and the best choice depends on individual preference for ergonomics and trigger feel.

Chapters

  1. 00:29Introduction: P320 RXP XFull vs Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS
  2. 01:43Sponsor: Big Daddy Unlimited
  3. 02:42Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS: Basic Specs
  4. 03:43Sig P320 RXP XFull: Basic Specs
  5. 04:37Design Differences: Coating & Materials
  6. 04:58Overall Feel & Ergonomics: Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS
  7. 05:45Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS: Trigger
  8. 06:13Overall Feel & Ergonomics: Sig P320 RXP XFull
  9. 07:36Sig P320 RXP XFull: Trigger (Factory)
  10. 08:23Trigger Pull Test: Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS
  11. 09:37Trigger Pull Test: Sig P320 RXP XFull
  12. 10:32Range Feel & Performance: Sig P320 RXP XFull
  13. 12:14Range Feel & Performance: Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS
  14. 14:05Ergonomics & Trigger Comparison Summary
  15. 14:35Reliability & Familiarity: Glock vs Sig
  16. 14:39Final Decision: Try Before You Buy
  17. 15:04Price Point Considerations
  18. 15:43Conclusion & Call to Action

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences in ergonomics between the Sig P320 RXP XFull and the Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS?

The Sig P320 RXP XFull is described as having a slightly better ergonomic feel for some, with a cleaner angle for wrists and grip style, making it easier to hold flatter. The Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS, while reliable, has ergonomics that some find 'a little bit off,' though many prefer its grip angle.

How do the triggers of the Sig P320 RXP XFull and Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS compare?

The Sig P320 RXP XFull trigger has very minimal creep and a softer break/reset. The Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS trigger has more take-up and creep, but offers a crisper tactile response on break and reset. Both have similar pull weights around 4.5-5 lbs.

Which pistol, the Sig P320 RXP XFull or Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS, is considered more forgiving under recoil?

The Sig P320 RXP XFull is noted for being extremely forgiving under recoil impulse, allowing for accuracy even with minor fundamental errors. It tends to 'buck or roll' slightly more due to its height over bore.

What are the advantages of the Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS regarding aftermarket support and reliability?

The Glock 17 Gen 5 MOS is praised for its proven reliability and durability, with extensive aftermarket support, making it easy to customize. It's often referred to as the 'Honda Civic of the gun world' for its widespread parts availability.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Tactical Considerations

View all →