FN FAL vs HK G3 | 100 Meter Unsupported

Published on December 1, 2013
Duration: 3:41

This video compares the FN FAL and HK G3 rifles in an unsupported 100-meter shooting drill. Both rifles fired 7.62x51mm NATO from standing positions. The FN FAL and HK G3 were then analyzed for shot grouping accuracy, with the visual evidence showing a split-screen comparison of their performance.

Quick Summary

The FN FAL and HK G3 were tested at 100 meters from an unsupported standing position using 7.62x51mm NATO ammunition and 20-round magazines. The comparison focused on shot groupings to determine accuracy differences between the two rifles' actions.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Preparation & Ammunition Loading
  2. 00:24FN FAL 100m Unsupported Shooting
  3. 01:38HK G3 100m Unsupported Shooting
  4. 02:49Target Analysis & Comparison

Frequently Asked Questions

What rifles were compared in the 100-meter unsupported shooting test?

The video compares the FN FAL and the HK G3 rifles. Both are chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO and were tested from an unsupported standing position at a distance of 100 meters.

What type of action does the HK G3 use?

The HK G3 utilizes a roller-delayed blowback action. This system is known for its effectiveness in managing the recoil of powerful rifle cartridges like the 7.62x51mm NATO.

How were the FN FAL and HK G3 compared for accuracy?

Accuracy was compared by analyzing the shot groupings on the targets after firing from an unsupported standing position at 100 meters. The results were presented side-by-side for direct comparison.

What ammunition and magazine capacity were used in the test?

Both the FN FAL and HK G3 were loaded with 7.62x51mm NATO ammunition. Standard 20-round magazines were used for both firearms during the shooting drill.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Polenar Tactical

View all →