Micro 9mm Vs Full Sized: Which Is Better? #pistol #glock #ammo

Published on June 10, 2024
Duration: 1:00

This video compares a full-sized FN 509 against a micro 9mm Taurus GX4 TORO. The FN 509 demonstrated superior performance, achieving a faster shooting time and a tighter group. The host concludes that while micro 9mms offer better concealability, they are harder to control, trading some performance for their compact size.

Quick Summary

The FN 509 (full-size 9mm) demonstrated better shooting performance, achieving a faster time of 2.82 seconds for 7 rounds and a tighter group compared to the Taurus GX4 TORO (micro 9mm), which took 3.14 seconds. The host noted micro 9mms are harder to control, trading performance for concealability.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Micro vs Full Size 9mm
  2. 00:12Firearms Featured: FN 509 & Taurus GX4 TORO
  3. 00:21Micro 9mm Shooting Test Results
  4. 00:31Full-Sized 9mm Shooting Test Results
  5. 00:38Target Analysis & Conclusion

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the performance difference between the FN 509 and Taurus GX4 TORO?

In a 7-round test, the full-sized FN 509 was shot in 2.82 seconds with a hand-sized group. The micro 9mm Taurus GX4 TORO took 3.14 seconds for 7 rounds with a slightly larger group, indicating the full-size pistol offered better control and accuracy.

Which 9mm pistol is easier to control: micro or full-sized?

The host concluded that micro 9mm pistols are generally harder to control than their full-sized counterparts. This trade-off is made for increased concealability, but it can impact shooting speed and accuracy.

What firearms were compared in the video?

The video compares a full-sized FN 509, provided by Gun Prime, and a micro 9mm Taurus GX4 TORO. Both pistols were equipped with red dot optics for the test.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Civilian Tactical

View all →