Modern Muzzleloaders Destroy Rifles?

Published on November 21, 2025
Duration: 12:59

This video from Banana Ballistics features an expert-level comparison of a modern .50 caliber muzzleloader against a .500 S&W Magnum rifle. Through a series of rigorous tests involving wood, concrete, sand, steel, and ballistics gel, the host demonstrates and analyzes the penetration capabilities and terminal ballistics of each firearm. The conclusion highlights that while modern muzzleloaders are potent, they do not surpass the performance of high-powered rifles like the .500 S&W Magnum in these specific tests.

Quick Summary

Expert ballistics testing by Banana Ballistics compared a .50 caliber muzzleloader and a .500 S&W Magnum rifle. While both penetrated wood similarly, the .500 S&W Magnum excelled against concrete and steel, and produced a larger wound cavity in ballistics gel, demonstrating superior performance.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Muzzleloader vs .500 S&W Magnum
  2. 00:43Wood Penetration Test Results
  3. 02:52Concrete Paver Penetration Test
  4. 03:40Firearm Specs: CVA Optima V2 & Bighorn Armory Model 89
  5. 06:42Sand Penetration Test
  6. 08:51Steel Plate Penetration Test
  7. 10:32Ballistics Gel Lethality Comparison
  8. 12:45Conclusion: Muzzleloader vs Rifle Performance

Frequently Asked Questions

How does a modern muzzleloader compare to a .500 S&W Magnum rifle in penetration tests?

In tests by Banana Ballistics, a .50 caliber muzzleloader and a .500 S&W Magnum rifle showed similar penetration in wood. However, the .500 S&W Magnum demonstrated superior performance against concrete and steel, and created a larger wound cavity in ballistics gel.

What were the results of the steel penetration test between a muzzleloader and a .500 S&W Magnum?

When tested against 3/16 inch mild steel, the .50 caliber muzzleloader created a significant dent. In contrast, the .500 S&W Magnum rifle successfully punched through the steel plate, indicating greater projectile energy and penetration capability.

Which firearm created a larger wound cavity in ballistics gel, the muzzleloader or the .500 S&W Magnum?

The .500 S&W Magnum rifle created a significantly larger temporary wound cavity in clear ballistics gel compared to the .50 caliber muzzleloader. This suggests greater tissue disruption and potential terminal effectiveness.

Are modern muzzleloaders as powerful as high-powered rifles like the .500 S&W Magnum?

Based on the penetration and lethality tests conducted, modern muzzleloaders are powerful but do not outperform high-powered rifles such as the .500 S&W Magnum. The rifle showed advantages in penetrating harder materials and creating larger wound channels.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Banana Ballistics

View all →