PSA Cult Destroys 110 SASS ACTUAL and Sig Sauron

Published on May 16, 2025
Duration: 90:36

This video features a discussion between two firearms enthusiasts about the controversial removal of the '110 SAS Actual' Instagram channel, attributing it to fanboy backlash against criticism of Palmetto State Armory (PSA) products, particularly their AAC ammunition. The speakers detail numerous issues with AAC ammo, including hard primers and light primer strikes, and contrast this with the perceived quality and reliability of other brands. They also critique PSA's product diversification strategy and the company's handling of negative feedback, while also discussing perceived quality issues with Sig Sauer firearms, specifically the P320 and the XM7 rifle. The conversation highlights the challenges of honest product assessment within online firearms communities and the impact of brand loyalty on critical discourse.

Quick Summary

Concerns about Palmetto State Armory's (PSA) AAC ammunition, including hard primers and light primer strikes, have led to firearm malfunctions. This, coupled with perceived quality control issues in PSA firearms like the Dagger, contrasts with Sig Sauer's documented safety problems, such as extractor failures on the M17. A poll indicated 81% of respondents would trust PSA over Sig Sauer, highlighting a significant erosion of trust in Sig Sauer due to these issues.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction & Live Setup
  2. 01:12110 SAS Actual Instagram Channel Deletion
  3. 03:07Issues with AAC Ammunition
  4. 05:07Light Primer Strikes & Blown Primers
  5. 06:07Hard Primers & Quality Control
  6. 07:35PSA Fanboy Backlash & Reporting
  7. 08:11The PSA 'Cult' Mentality
  8. 09:06PSA Dagger & Saber Testing Experiences
  9. 10:40AAC Ammo Issues in PSA Dagger Test
  10. 11:24Other YouTubers Reporting AAC Issues
  11. 12:22Community Backlash Against Criticism
  12. 13:44PSA Life Cycle & Competitor Comparison
  13. 15:10PSA vs. SIG Poll Discussion
  14. 17:39PSA Product Release Strategy
  15. 19:57Technical Issues & Disconnections
  16. 20:36Repelling the 'PSA Cult' Attack
  17. 21:27Revisiting PSA Ammunition Issues
  18. 22:31Honesty & Updating Information
  19. 23:20110 SAS Actual's Honest Take
  20. 24:00Misinterpreting Criticism as Hating Affordability
  21. 24:51YouTube as a Marketing Tool
  22. 26:02Entry-Level Firearms Market Issues
  23. 29:07Gun Counter Narratives & PSA's Rise
  24. 30:33The 'Just As Good' Mentality vs. Quality
  25. 31:39Car Analogy for Firearm Purchasing
  26. 32:04Gun Guys' Funny Logic on Pricing
  27. 33:33Honesty in Firearm Ownership Goals
  28. 34:08Censorship of Reviews on PSA Website
  29. 35:53The Culture of Honest Discourse
  30. 36:50Authentic Content Creation vs. Ads
  31. 39:40Audience Waking Up to Issues
  32. 41:05Technical Difficulties & Chat Interaction
  33. 42:12Expectations After Channel Deletion
  34. 43:29Another 'PSA Cult' Attack Repelled
  35. 44:01Call for PSA Accountability
  36. 45:42Viewer Engagement & Channel Support
  37. 46:39Bones Maloney YouTube Channel Intro
  38. 47:18PSA Releasing Unrequested Products
  39. 47:39Harrington & Richardson 300 Blackout Release
  40. 48:05Thoughts on H&R 300 Blackout Pistol
  41. 49:45PSA's Out-of-Touch Product Releases
  42. 51:03Improving PSA's Core Product Lines
  43. 52:30PSA's 'Jackal' Meme & Quality Issues
  44. 53:13Devil's Advocate: PSA as a 'Fun Brand'
  45. 55:01Disagreeing on 'Fun Guns' vs. Practicality
  46. 56:02Focus on Perfect Product for Performance
  47. 57:32Utility and Training Mindset
  48. 59:38Encouraging Serious Firearm Ownership
  49. 60:22PSA vs. SIG Discussion - Poll Results
  50. 61:36Trusting PSA Over SIG
  51. 62:13Sig Sauer M17 Safety Issues
  52. 63:38PSA vs. Sig Sauer Safety Comparison
  53. 64:00PSA vs. Sig Sauer: Safe but Bad
  54. 64:33Poll: Dagger vs. P320 Carry
  55. 65:12Shitty Car vs. Brakes Failing Analogy
  56. 65:37Sig Sauer's XM7 Release Video Analysis
  57. 66:02Sig Sauer Losing the Civilian Market
  58. 67:00Overpriced Sig Sauer XM7 Criticisms
  59. 69:05Errands & Selling Bike Parts
  60. 70:09Sig XM7: Barrel Life & Suppressor Issues
  61. 70:42Suppressor Considerations for XM7
  62. 71:31Suppressor Heat & Liability for Infantry
  63. 73:58Real-World Combat Environment & Gear
  64. 74:41Training Soldiers Not to Touch Hot Suppressors
  65. 75:33XM7 Designed to Be Suppressed
  66. 77:00Conclusion & Future Discussion

Frequently Asked Questions

What led to the removal of the 110 SAS Actual Instagram channel?

The removal of the 110 SAS Actual Instagram channel is attributed to a coordinated effort by 'PSA cult fanboys' who allegedly mass-reported the account after 110 SAS Actual posted critical content about Palmetto State Armory (PSA) products, particularly their AAC ammunition, and PSA's handling of customer feedback.

What are the reported issues with Palmetto State Armory's (PSA) AAC ammunition?

Reports indicate significant problems with PSA's AAC ammunition, including hard primers, light primer strikes, inconsistent accuracy, and blown-out primers. These issues have led to firearm malfunctions and potential damage, particularly noted in 9mm 124-grain and 5.56 55-grain loads.

Why do some consumers prefer PSA firearms over Sig Sauer, despite PSA's perceived quality issues?

Despite PSA's known reliability concerns, a poll showed 81% of respondents would trust PSA over Sig Sauer. This preference stems from documented safety issues with Sig Sauer firearms, such as extractor failures on the M17 and potential issues with the P320, making PSA's 'bad but safe' reputation more appealing than Sig's 'potentially unsafe' reputation for some.

What are the main criticisms of the Sig Sauer XM7 rifle?

The Sig Sauer XM7 rifle is criticized for its high price ($4,600+), excessive weight (12-13 lbs), proprietary cartridge, and a suppressor that generates significant heat, making it a liability for conventional infantry. Its design is seen as impractical for widespread military adoption.

How does brand loyalty impact the discussion of firearm quality?

Brand loyalty can create a 'cult' mentality where consumers defend products even when faced with evidence of flaws or safety issues. This can lead to the suppression of honest criticism, mass reporting of dissenting voices, and a distorted perception of product quality within online communities.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Trench Grenade

View all →