Remington 1100 Slug Barrel Shoot & Review 50 & 100 Yards

This YouTube video is a preview for an upcoming range review focusing on a 1,000-round test. The content is geared towards firearm enthusiasts interested in evaluating the performance and reliability of a firearm after significant use. The impending review suggests a focus on durability, functionality, and potential issues that may arise during extended shooting sessions.

This review tests the effectiveness of a 12-gauge double slug shell, finding it delivers significant energy transfer and a tight grouping at 35 yards. The test involved ballistics gel, a water target, and paper accuracy, demonstrating the potential of this multi-projectile load for various applications.

This video, titled "The most painful shotgun I've ever used!" (translated from Portuguese), likely focuses on a review or range test of a shotgun that the creator found to be particularly unpleasant to shoot. Given the title's emphasis on pain, the content could involve recoil, handling issues, or other discomforts associated with the firearm. The video is expected to be a firsthand account of the user's experience with this specific shotgun, possibly comparing it to others or detailing the reasons behind its painful nature.

This review tests the accuracy of a 9mm round fired from a 12-gauge shotgun using a rifled adapter. The adapter, despite having rifling, proved inaccurate due to its short length and loose fit. Accuracy tests showed scattered hits and potential keyholing, significantly worse than a standard 9mm handgun.

This video tests the accuracy of home-cast versus store-bought shotgun slugs, debunking the myth that homemade slugs are less accurate. Both types produced equally tight groups when fired from a Beretta A300 Ultima Patrol. The host also highlights the shotgun's performance and promotes tactical gear.

This YouTube video features FPSRussia, a popular firearms personality, testing the capabilities of a shotgun. The title, 'Can FPS Russia Handle This Shotgun?', suggests a performance-based review or challenge. The content likely involves live-fire testing, evaluating the shotgun's handling, accuracy, and overall performance in the hands of a well-known figure in the firearms community. Viewers can expect to see the shotgun in action and get a sense of whether it meets the demands of a seasoned shooter.

This video compares the terminal performance of five common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) by shooting watermelons. The test demonstrates a significant increase in destructive power from .22LR up to .45 ACP, with the larger calibers causing more explosive expansion and fragmentation. Specific hollow-point ammunition from Speer, Aguila, and Underwood was used, highlighting the importance of bullet construction for terminal ballistics.

Buckeye Ballistics conducted a comparative test of common pistol calibers (.22LR, .380 ACP, 9mm, .40 S&W, .45 ACP) against concrete blocks. The host, demonstrating significant firearm and ballistics knowledge, emphasized extreme safety precautions due to ricochet risks. The test revealed that while larger calibers showed more damage, none could fully penetrate the concrete block's second wall, suggesting limitations for self-defense scenarios against hardened barriers.

This Taurus TX22 review details its performance with various .22 LR ammunition. While initially reliable with CCI Mini-Mags and cycling standard velocity rounds well, it encountered malfunctions with sub-sonic and high-velocity loads. A catastrophic failure occurred due to a squib load followed by a second shot, resulting in a bulged barrel and damaged magazine.

This video compares the terminal ballistics of .22LR, .22WMR, and .17HMR rimfire cartridges using cantaloupes as targets. The .22LR showed a clean pass-through with minor damage, the .22WMR caused an explosive front-face disintegration, and the .17HMR, despite its speed, disintegrated internally with no exit. The test highlights how different rimfire rounds perform on soft tissue simulants.