Should You Carry a MilSurp Gun?

Published on May 31, 2018
Duration: 13:18

This video provides a critical assessment of using military surplus handguns for self-defense. The BurstReview Host, with high authority, explains that while historically interesting and affordable, older MilSurp designs often struggle with modern defensive ammunition due to their original design parameters and feed ramp geometry. He highlights specific models like the Wanad P-83, Makarov IJ-70, TT-33, Walther P1, and M1911, detailing their pros and cons regarding reliability, ergonomics, and suitability for concealed carry, ultimately recommending modern production firearms for reliable EDC.

Quick Summary

Military surplus firearms are generally not recommended for modern self-defense due to reliability issues with contemporary hollow-point ammunition. Their designs, often based on older ballistics and feed ramp geometries, can lead to malfunctions. While interesting historically, modern production handguns are typically better suited for reliable concealed carry.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Military Surplus for Carry
  2. 01:05The Defensive Ammo Problem
  3. 01:55Wanad P-83 Review
  4. 04:33Makarov IJ-70 Review
  5. 06:20Polish TT-33 Tokarev Review
  6. 08:16Walther P1 (P38) Review
  7. 10:16M1911 (Auto-Ordnance) Review
  8. 12:49Conclusion and Recommendation

Frequently Asked Questions

Are military surplus guns suitable for self-defense?

While historically interesting and often affordable, many military surplus firearms are not ideal for modern self-defense. They were designed for older ammunition types and can experience reliability issues with today's defensive hollow-point rounds due to feed ramp geometry and action types.

What are the main drawbacks of carrying a military surplus handgun?

Key drawbacks include potential unreliability with modern defensive ammunition (especially hollow-points), less ergonomic designs, heavier trigger pulls, and often poor sights. Their suitability for concealed carry also varies greatly due to size and profile.

Which military surplus handguns were reviewed for carry potential?

The review covered the Wanad P-83, Makarov IJ-70, TT-33 Tokarev, Walther P1, and an Auto-Ordnance M1911. Each was assessed for its action type, caliber, reliability with modern ammo, and suitability for everyday carry.

Why do older guns struggle with hollow-point ammunition?

Older firearms, particularly those with direct blowback actions and less refined feed ramps, were designed for round-nose ball ammunition. Hollow-point rounds have different shapes that can snag on the feed ramp or chamber, leading to feeding malfunctions.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from BurstReview

View all →