Smith and Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 - an improved Bodyguard 1.0? Or a totally new breed? It’s really good

Published on September 26, 2024
Duration: 10:06

This review compares the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 1.0 and 2.0, highlighting significant redesigns in the 2.0. The reviewer, a long-time owner, details differences in trigger pull weight, magazine capacity, takedown mechanisms, and overall feel, concluding the 2.0 is a substantial improvement and a different breed of firearm, not just an iteration.

Quick Summary

The Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 represents a major redesign from the 1.0, featuring a striker-fired system and a lighter trigger pull averaging around 5.75 lbs, compared to the 1.0's hammer-fired DAO at 7.5 lbs. It also boasts higher magazine capacity (10/12 rounds vs. 6) and a more modern takedown.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Bodyguard 380
  2. 00:14Bodyguard 1.0 Features (No Laser)
  3. 00:26Bodyguard 1.0 Safety and Slide Lock
  4. 00:45Bodyguard 1.0 Slide Serrations
  5. 00:53Bodyguard 1.0 Hammer Fire, DAO
  6. 01:08Bodyguard 1.0 Trigger Pull Weight
  7. 01:30Bodyguard 1.0 Magazine Capacity (6+1)
  8. 01:58Bodyguard 1.0 Takedown Procedure
  9. 02:37Smith & Wesson's Recent Redesigns
  10. 02:51Bodyguard 2.0 vs. 1.0: A Different Gun
  11. 03:03Bodyguard 2.0 Stippling and Frame Size
  12. 03:08Bodyguard 2.0 Magazine Capacity (10/12 Round)
  13. 03:30Bodyguard 2.0 Safety and Racking Slide
  14. 03:37Bodyguard 2.0 Bladed Flat Trigger
  15. 03:46Bodyguard 2.0 Trigger Pull Weight
  16. 04:13Bodyguard 2.0 Takedown Procedure
  17. 04:43Bodyguard 2.0 vs. Shield/Full Size M&P
  18. 05:03Comparison to Shield 1.0 and M&P 40
  19. 05:27Viewer Backlash on Bodyguard 2.0
  20. 06:04Addressing Size Concerns: Bodyguard 2.0
  21. 06:38Carryability with Holster and 12-Round Mag
  22. 07:01Deep Concealment and Comfort
  23. 07:23Bodyguard 2.0 Slide Serrations
  24. 07:36Bodyguard 2.0 Magazine Loading
  25. 07:56Bodyguard 2.0 Magazine Spacer Design
  26. 08:27Bodyguard 1.0 vs. 2.0 Side-by-Side
  27. 08:41Size Comparison: Barrel and Width
  28. 08:57Rear Sight Comparison
  29. 09:08Front Sight Comparison (Night Sight)
  30. 09:16Bodyguard 2.0: A Complete Redesign
  31. 09:21Miniaturized M&P Full Size Look
  32. 09:31Conclusion: Phenomenal Micro Compact 380
  33. 09:46Final Thoughts and Support 2A

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key differences between the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 1.0 and 2.0?

The Bodyguard 2.0 is a significant redesign, featuring a striker-fired system and a lighter trigger (around 5.75 lbs) compared to the 1.0's hammer-fired DAO trigger (around 7.5 lbs). The 2.0 also offers higher magazine capacity (10/12 rounds vs. 6) and a more modern takedown procedure similar to the M&P Shield.

How does the trigger pull weight compare between the Bodyguard 1.0 and 2.0?

The Bodyguard 1.0 has a double-action-only trigger pull averaging around 7.5 lbs, described as smooth and repeatable. The Bodyguard 2.0 features a striker-fired bladed flat trigger that is considerably lighter, averaging approximately 5.75 lbs, offering a more crisp and consistent pull.

What are the magazine capacities for the S&W Bodyguard 1.0 and 2.0?

The original Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 1.0 typically comes with a 6-round magazine for the .380 ACP cartridge. The newer Bodyguard 2.0 offers increased capacity, with standard magazines holding 10 rounds, and extended 12-round magazines also available (often blocked to 10 rounds in certain states).

Is the Smith & Wesson Bodyguard 2.0 significantly larger than the 1.0 for concealed carry?

While the Bodyguard 2.0 is slightly longer in barrel and frame, the difference is minimal (about half an inch). When carried in a proper holster, the reviewer finds it no more noticeable than the 1.0, offering deep concealment and comfort, especially with the 12-round magazine.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Cranky Gun Reviews

View all →