The Better 5.7x28 Pistol & Are Either Good for Anything? (PSA vs FN)

Published on March 24, 2025
Duration: 9:28

This video provides a detailed comparison between the PSA 57 Rock and the FN 57 pistols, both chambered in 5.7x28mm. The reviewer highlights key differences in operating systems (lock breach vs. delayed blowback), slide construction (steel vs. polymer-covered internal), trigger mechanisms (striker-fired vs. hammer-fired), and frame quality. While the PSA is noted for its Glock-like features and lower price point, the FN is praised for its superior build quality, internal hammer mechanism, and better trigger.

Quick Summary

The PSA 57 Rock and FN 57 pistols differ significantly in their operating systems, slide construction, and firing mechanisms. The PSA uses a lock breach system and is striker-fired, while the FN employs delayed blowback and is hammer-fired. The FN 57 is considered higher quality with a better trigger and frame, but the PSA 57 Rock offers excellent value and customization options, often costing less than half the price.

Chapters

  1. 00:10Introduction & Previous Comparison
  2. 00:29Introducing the PSA 57 Rock
  3. 00:35Comparison to FN 57
  4. 01:16Physical Similarities & Differences
  5. 01:30Operating Systems: Lock Breach vs. Delayed Blowback
  6. 01:41Slide Construction: Steel vs. Polymer Cover
  7. 02:14Suppressor Height Sights
  8. 02:43Extractor Differences
  9. 02:53Trigger Comparison
  10. 03:22Manual Safety on FN 57
  11. 03:25Grip Feel and Capacity
  12. 03:49Internal Comparison: Frame Quality
  13. 04:32Internal Comparison: Slide Mechanism
  14. 05:01Hammer-Fired vs. Striker-Fired
  15. 05:36Trigger Feel and Mechanism Preference
  16. 05:50PSA 57 Rock: Good, Glock-like Value
  17. 06:19FN 57: The Better Gun
  18. 06:44Price Difference and Customization
  19. 07:15PSA 57 Rock: Good for Glock Fans & DIYers
  20. 07:23FN 57: A Great Gun Regardless of Price
  21. 07:37Are They Optimal Carry Guns? Novelties?
  22. 07:48Testing the 5.7x28mm Caliber's Utility
  23. 08:29Recap: PSA for Glock Fans, FN for Better Gun

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between the PSA 57 Rock and the FN 57?

The primary differences lie in their operating systems (PSA uses lock breach, FN uses delayed blowback), slide construction (PSA has a steel slide, FN has a polymer-covered internal slide), and firing mechanisms (PSA is striker-fired, FN is hammer-fired). The FN also features a better-adjustable rear sight and a generally higher quality frame.

Which pistol has a better trigger, the PSA 57 Rock or the FN 57?

The FN 57's trigger is generally considered better, averaging around 3 lbs with a more refined mechanism due to its internal hammer. The PSA 57 Rock has a Glock-like trigger averaging just over 4.5 lbs, which is still light but less sophisticated.

Is the 5.7x28mm caliber useful, or is it just a novelty?

The reviewer initially considered the 5.7x28mm caliber a novelty but found through testing that it performs comparably to 9mm, and in some aspects, even better. This challenges the notion that it's solely for niche applications.

Which pistol is a better value for the money, the PSA 57 Rock or the FN 57?

The PSA 57 Rock offers significantly better value, often costing less than half the price of the FN 57. While the FN is a higher quality firearm, the PSA provides a good, Glock-like experience in 5.7x28mm at a much more accessible price point.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →