The Great WheelGun Showdown! (S&W 686+ vs. Ruger GP100)

Published on March 28, 2020
Duration: 14:37

This guide provides a comprehensive comparison between the Smith & Wesson 686+ and the Ruger GP100, drawing on expert insights from TheYankeeMarshal. It covers physical similarities, aesthetic differences, internal mechanisms, frame construction, trigger quality, and price points. The speaker, demonstrating high authority and extensive hands-on experience, highlights the S&W 686+ for its refined trigger and finish, while acknowledging the Ruger GP100's robust design and broader caliber options. Both are deemed excellent, reliable firearms with no definitively 'wrong' choice.

Quick Summary

The Smith & Wesson 686+ and Ruger GP100 are both highly regarded .357 Magnum revolvers. Key differences lie in their construction (forged vs. cast steel), internal access (side plate vs. unibody), and trigger quality, with the S&W generally offering a smoother pull. The Ruger often provides more caliber options and a robust crane lock, while the S&W typically costs about $100 more.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction and Bias Disclosure
  2. 01:18Physical Similarities and Calibers
  3. 02:57Aesthetics, Finish, and Engraving
  4. 04:18Internal Locks and Forging vs. Casting
  5. 06:46Mechanical Design: Releases and Lockup
  6. 08:09Frame Construction and Maintenance
  7. 10:59Trigger Pull and Internals
  8. 13:30Price and Final Verdict

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the main differences between the Smith & Wesson 686+ and the Ruger GP100?

The S&W 686+ generally offers a smoother trigger pull and more refined finish, while the Ruger GP100 provides more caliber options and a robust crane lock mechanism. The S&W uses a traditional frame access via a side plate, whereas the Ruger has a unibody design. Both are durable .357 Magnum revolvers.

Which revolver has a better trigger pull, the S&W 686+ or the Ruger GP100?

The S&W 686+ is typically praised for its significantly smoother, cleaner, and sharper trigger pull due to more precisely machined internals. The Ruger GP100's trigger is often described as 'clunkier' and more prone to stacking, though it can be improved with aftermarket work.

What are the construction differences between the S&W 686+ and Ruger GP100?

The Smith & Wesson 686+ is constructed from forged stainless steel and features a traditional frame with a side plate for internal access. The Ruger GP100 utilizes investment cast steel in a unibody design, where the trigger guard assembly is removed for internal access, and features a crane lock for added rigidity.

Is the Ruger GP100 or S&W 686+ a better value?

The Ruger GP100 is generally about $100 less expensive than the Smith & Wesson 686+. While the S&W offers a more refined experience, particularly in trigger quality, the GP100 provides excellent durability and reliability, making the 'better value' subjective to the user's priorities and budget.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →