The Truth About Ruger Revolvers!?! Why They're Inferior To Smith & Colt!

Published on February 23, 2024
Duration: 10:16

This review argues that Ruger revolvers, while robust, are inferior to Smith & Wesson and Colt in terms of refinement and trigger quality. The 'tank-like' perception stems from investment-cast frames requiring thicker walls than forged frames. Internal mechanisms and finishing details are cited as areas where Ruger falls short of its competitors, despite being a high-quality manufacturer.

Quick Summary

Ruger revolvers are often perceived as less refined than Smith & Wesson or Colt due to their investment-cast frames requiring thicker designs for strength, unlike forged frames. Critics also point to less refined internal mechanisms, trigger pulls, and finishing details as key differences.

Chapters

  1. 00:06Ruger vs. S&W/Colt Debate
  2. 01:33Cast vs. Forged Frames Explained
  3. 02:40Grip Frame Design Differences
  4. 03:11The Myth of 'Ruger Only' Loads
  5. 04:42Internal Mechanisms & Trigger Quality
  6. 05:38Firearm Quality Ranking
  7. 06:10Finishing and Aesthetics Criticisms

Frequently Asked Questions

Why are Ruger revolvers often perceived as less refined than Smith & Wesson or Colt?

Ruger revolvers use investment-cast frames, which are inherently less dense than the forged frames of Smith & Wesson and Colt. To achieve similar strength, Ruger frames must be thicker. Additionally, Ruger's internal mechanisms, trigger pulls, and finishing details are considered less refined by some experts.

What is the origin of the 'Ruger Only' ammunition designation?

The 'Ruger Only' designation for certain .45 Long Colt loads originated because older Colt Single Action Army revolvers had lower pressure tolerances. Modern Rugers, like modern Smith & Wessons, can generally handle higher pressures, making the distinction less about Ruger's inherent strength over S&W and more about historical firearm limitations.

How does Ruger's frame construction differ from Smith & Wesson and Colt?

Ruger primarily uses investment casting for its frames, which requires thicker designs to match the strength of forged frames used by Smith & Wesson and Colt. This manufacturing difference contributes to Ruger's reputation for being 'tank-like' but also affects refinement.

What specific areas do critics point to when comparing Ruger to Colt and S&W revolvers?

Critics often cite Ruger's trigger pull quality, internal lockwork refinement, hammer appearance, and push-button cylinder release as areas where they fall short compared to the more refined designs and finishes found on Colt and Smith & Wesson revolvers.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →