The Worst Handgun of the Century!!!...So far.

Published on February 15, 2023
Duration: 7:24

The Yankee Marshal identifies the Kimber Solo as the worst handgun of the 21st century so far, citing its poor design, especially the safety, and lack of refinement. He also discusses the Smith & Wesson CSX and M&P 5.7 as potential contenders for this title due to their perceived poor build quality, bad triggers, and uncomfortable ergonomics, despite their potential.

Quick Summary

The Kimber Solo is currently considered the worst handgun of the 21st century so far due to its 'awful gun' design and 'horrible' safety. Potential contenders include the Smith & Wesson CSX and M&P 5.7, criticized for poor build quality, bad triggers, and uncomfortable ergonomics, despite their potential for improvement.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Worst Gun of the Century Question
  2. 00:37The Kimber Solo: A Flawed Design
  3. 01:50Contenders for Worst Gun: S&W CSX & M&P 5.7
  4. 03:02Smith & Wesson CSX: Poor Execution
  5. 03:52Smith & Wesson M&P 5.7: Cheap Materials & Design
  6. 05:32Future Potential for Worst Gun Title
  7. 05:38Criticism of Modern Smith & Wesson
  8. 06:42Live Chat Invitation & Discussion

Frequently Asked Questions

What is considered the worst handgun of the 21st century so far?

According to The Yankee Marshal, the Kimber Solo holds the title of the worst handgun of the 21st century thus far. He cites its 'awful gun' design, particularly its 'horrible' safety mechanism, and a general lack of refinement as key reasons for this assessment.

Which new handguns are potential contenders for the 'worst gun' title?

The Smith & Wesson CSX and the Smith & Wesson M&P 5.7 are identified as potential contenders. They are criticized for poor build quality, bad triggers, uncomfortable ergonomics, and a perceived lack of development investment by the manufacturer.

What criteria make a handgun qualify as one of the 'worst'?

For a firearm to be considered among the worst, it must have had potential to be good and come from a manufacturer with a reputation for quality. This means a gun that fails despite reasonable expectations is worse than a cheap, inherently flawed product from a low-tier brand.

Why is the Smith & Wesson CSX criticized?

The Smith & Wesson CSX is criticized for being poorly made, featuring an awful trigger and bad ergonomics. The speaker suggests the design may have been compromised during development, leading to a subpar final product.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →