Top 4 Guns To Get Rid Of!

Published on November 19, 2023
Duration: 1:00

This video offers a critical review of four firearms from the perspective of an experienced firearms commentator. The speaker discusses the Kel-Tec Sub-2000, Sig Sauer P320, and Smith & Wesson 500, highlighting their pros and cons based on personal ownership and practical experience. The review emphasizes evaluating firearms for specific needs, considering factors like reliability, shootability, and potential design flaws, and concludes with a commentary on the perceived hypocrisy of Hollywood elites advocating for gun control while using armed security.

Quick Summary

An experienced firearms commentator advises getting rid of the Kel-Tec Sub-2000, Sig Sauer P320 (due to drop safety concerns), and the S&W 500 (due to excessive recoil). The video also critiques the use of firearms by security for gun-control advocating celebrities.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Guns to Get Rid Of
  2. 00:09Kel-Tec Sub-2000 Review
  3. 00:25Sig Sauer P320 Drop Safety Concerns
  4. 00:37Smith & Wesson 500 Recoil Issues
  5. 00:45Hollywood Security Firearms Critique

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the Kel-Tec Sub-2000 recommended for disposal?

While the Kel-Tec Sub-2000 features a folding design and magazine compatibility with brands like Glock and Beretta, the speaker suggests an AR pistol is a superior choice for a backpack gun, implying the Sub-2000 falls short in practical utility for that role.

What are the main concerns with the Sig Sauer P320 mentioned in the video?

The primary concern highlighted regarding the Sig Sauer P320 relates to historical drop-safety issues. The speaker indicates these concerns were significant enough for him to personally get rid of both full-size and sub-compact versions he owned.

What is the speaker's opinion on the Smith & Wesson 500?

The speaker finds the Smith & Wesson 500 chambered in .500 S&W Magnum to be impractical and unenjoyable to shoot due to its excessive recoil. He describes the caliber as 'ridiculous' for practical purposes.

What is the broader critique presented in the video regarding firearms and public figures?

The video concludes with a critique of Hollywood elites who advocate for stricter gun control measures while simultaneously relying on armed private security for their protection, suggesting a perceived hypocrisy.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from God Family and Guns

View all →