United Healthcare: Not a Welrod

Published on December 4, 2024
Duration: 0:57

This video debunks theories that a Welrod or VP9 pistol was used in a New York City incident. Ian McCollum analyzes surveillance footage, identifying the weapon as a semi-auto pistol with a malfunctioning suppressor. He differentiates the observed malfunction clearing from the manual cycling of a Welrod or VP9, highlighting distinct mechanical differences.

Quick Summary

Surveillance footage analysis debunks theories of a Welrod or VP9 pistol being used in a New York City incident. The weapon was identified as a semi-automatic pistol with a malfunctioning suppressor, and its manual cycling action was distinct from that of a Welrod or VP9.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Addressing Welrod/VP9 Rumors
  2. 00:14Surveillance Video Analysis
  3. 00:31Mechanical Differences Explained

Frequently Asked Questions

What weapon was mistakenly identified in the New York City incident?

Initial theories incorrectly suggested a Welrod or a modern VP9 pistol was used. However, analysis of surveillance footage revealed the weapon was a semi-automatic pistol with a malfunctioning suppressor.

Why is the observed pistol action different from a Welrod or VP9?

The shooter was seen manually cycling the slide to clear malfunctions. This action, while appearing similar, is mechanically distinct from the deliberate manual operation required for bolt-action firearms like the Welrod or B&T VP9.

What issues did the suppressor on the observed pistol have?

The suppressor was poorly set up and malfunctioned on nearly every shot. This indicates a significant problem with the suppressor's design or attachment, leading to repeated cycling issues for the shooter.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →