US Military Made a BIG Mistake Choosing SIG P320 M17/M18!?!

Published on April 6, 2023
Duration: 12:30

The Yankee Marshal assesses the US Military's adoption of the SIG Sauer P320 M17/M18, arguing it's a capable and cost-effective choice despite some criticisms. He refutes claims of unreliability and unsafety, attributing incidents to user error rather than the firearm itself. His primary critique is the inclusion of a manual safety, which he believes is unnecessary and potentially detrimental in high-stress situations for trained military personnel.

Quick Summary

The SIG Sauer P320 M17/M18 is the official handgun of the US military, chosen for its reliability, modularity, and cost-effectiveness. While some criticize its safety features, the speaker argues that incidents are due to user error, not the firearm itself, making it a capable and economical choice for service.

Chapters

  1. 00:18Introduction: M17/M18 Adoption
  2. 00:53Is the M17/M18 a Good Military Gun?
  3. 01:35Addressing Reliability and Safety Concerns
  4. 02:46Case Studies of Accidental Discharges
  5. 03:46Firearm Reliability and Safety Verdict
  6. 04:32Polymer Frames in Military Service
  7. 04:51Handgun Usage in the Military
  8. 05:39Cost and Repair Advantages
  9. 06:31Military Handgun Needs
  10. 06:43Alternative Choices and Cross-Compatibility
  11. 07:33The Safety Feature: A Major Flaw?
  12. 08:44Overall Assessment of the P320
  13. 09:36Comparison to M9 and Glock
  14. 10:11Final Thoughts on M17/M18

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the US military choose the SIG Sauer P320 M17/M18?

The US military adopted the SIG Sauer P320 M17/M18 due to its reliability, modularity, and cost-effectiveness. The modular design allows for easier repairs and component standardization, saving taxpayer money in the long run. It's considered a capable and safe duty handgun for military service.

Are the SIG P320 M17/M18 firearms unsafe or unreliable?

The speaker strongly refutes claims of the SIG P320 M17/M18 being unsafe or unreliable. He argues that incidents are primarily due to user error, incompetence, and irresponsible handling, similar to issues seen with early Glock adoptions. Lawsuits are often fueled by anti-gun groups seeking financial gain.

What is the main criticism of the SIG P320 M17/M18 for military use?

The primary criticism from the speaker is the inclusion of a manual safety on the M17/M18. He believes that for trained military personnel, a manual safety is unnecessary and can be a liability in high-stress situations, potentially hindering rapid deployment of the weapon.

How does the modularity of the SIG P320 benefit the military?

The modularity of the SIG P320 is a significant advantage for the military. It allows for individual components like frames to be replaced cheaply (around $20-$30), reducing overall repair costs. This also simplifies logistics by ensuring parts compatibility across a standardized firearm.

Related News

All News →

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from TheYankeeMarshal

View all →