XM-177 Moderator vs Fake Flash Hider

Published on February 6, 2026
Duration: 1:28

This expert-level comparison by Ian McCollum of Forgotten Weapons evaluates the sound differences between a real XM-177 moderator and a fake flash hider, using a standard M16 as a baseline. The testing highlights the extreme loudness of the fake flash hider and references historical military data to underscore the effectiveness of the original XM-177 moderator in reducing both flash and sound.

Quick Summary

A fake flash hider on an XM-177 clone is purely cosmetic and extremely loud, making it unsuitable for firing without hearing protection. In contrast, the original XM-177 moderator was designed for effective flash and sound reduction, as confirmed by 1968 military testing.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Comparison Goals: XM-177 Moderator vs. Fake Flash Hider
  2. 00:15Testing the Fake Flash Hider's Loudness
  3. 00:31Baseline Sound Test: Standard M16 Rifle
  4. 00:45Direct Audio & Visual Comparison
  5. 00:50Addressing Audio Capture Challenges
  6. 01:18Historical Context: 1968 XM-177 Test Report

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the primary difference in function between an XM-177 moderator and a fake flash hider?

The XM-177 moderator is a functional muzzle device designed to reduce flash and sound. A fake flash hider is purely cosmetic, offering no sound or flash reduction benefits and can be extremely loud when fired.

How loud is an XM-177 clone with a fake flash hider?

According to Forgotten Weapons, an XM-177 clone equipped with a fake flash hider is extremely loud and unsuitable for shooting without proper hearing protection.

What historical data supports the effectiveness of the XM-177 moderator?

A 1968 military report documented the original testing of the XM-177 moderator, confirming its effectiveness in reducing muzzle flash and sound signature during its operational era.

More Reviews Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →