Kyle Rittenhouse - Let's talk facts in the Kenosha Wisconsin shooting from a Lawyer's standpoint

Published on August 28, 2020
Duration: 13:25

This analysis, presented from a lawyer's standpoint by Colion Noir, breaks down the legal aspects of the Kyle Rittenhouse incident in Kenosha, Wisconsin. It examines Rittenhouse's stated intent, the legality of his firearm possession as a minor, and critically, the application of Wisconsin's self-defense laws, particularly concerning the duty to retreat and the concept of the initial aggressor. The video emphasizes the legal justification for Rittenhouse's use of force based on the presented evidence and legal statutes.

Quick Summary

Wisconsin law permits deadly force if reasonably necessary to avoid death or great bodily harm, with no duty to retreat unless one is the initial aggressor. If the initial aggressor, all escape means must be exhausted before using deadly force. Possessing a dangerous weapon as a minor is a Class A misdemeanor, with limited exceptions.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to Rittenhouse Case & Colion Noir's Take
  2. 00:27Kyle Rittenhouse's Stated Intent: Protecting Businesses & People
  3. 00:46AR-15 as a Self-Defense Tool in Riots
  4. 01:25Legality of a Minor Possessing a Firearm in Wisconsin
  5. 02:14Curfew Violations and Travel Distances of Participants
  6. 03:21Overview of Wisconsin Self-Defense Law
  7. 03:51Confrontation with Joseph Rosenbaum
  8. 04:09McGinnis's Pre-Shooting Interview with Kyle
  9. 05:39McGinnis's Account of the First Shooting Incident
  10. 06:24Video Analysis of the First Shooting: Evasion and Aggression
  11. 07:43Mob Pursuit After the First Shooting
  12. 08:34Skateboard Attack and Subsequent Shootings
  13. 09:04Kyle on the Ground: Attacked by a Mob
  14. 10:37Confrontation with Gaige Grosskreutz
  15. 11:26Legal Justification for Self-Defense in the Incident
  16. 12:27Promoting Concealed Carry Insurance (USCCA)

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the key aspects of Wisconsin's self-defense law as explained in the Kyle Rittenhouse case analysis?

Wisconsin law allows deadly force if reasonably necessary to avoid death or great bodily harm. Crucially, there's no duty to retreat unless you are the initial aggressor. If you are the initial aggressor, you must exhaust all escape options before using deadly force.

Can a minor legally possess a firearm like an AR-15 in Wisconsin, according to the analysis?

Generally, possessing a dangerous weapon as a minor under 18 in Wisconsin is a Class A misdemeanor. Exceptions exist for specific firearm types like short-barreled rifles/shotguns or with a hunting approval certificate, but the analysis suggests these exceptions may not apply to Rittenhouse's situation.

How does the concept of 'initial aggressor' apply to the Kyle Rittenhouse incident?

The 'initial aggressor' status is critical. If Rittenhouse was the initial aggressor, his right to self-defense is limited. However, if he was evading an attacker, the dynamic shifts, and the pursuer may become the new aggressor, potentially justifying Rittenhouse's use of force.

What legal justification is presented for Kyle Rittenhouse's use of force in the Kenosha incident?

The analysis suggests Rittenhouse's use of force was legally justified due to the disparity of force and the reasonable belief of imminent death or great bodily harm. Even if he illegally carried the firearm as a minor, this does not forfeit his right to self-defense.

Related News

All News →

More Self Defense Videos You Might Like

More from Colion Noir

View all →