Interview with Neil Vermillion: Being a Volunteer Fighter & Trainer

Published on July 3, 2023
Duration: 91:15

Neil Vermillion, a former US Army soldier and training advisor in Iraq and Ukraine, discusses his experiences as a volunteer fighter and trainer. He details his motivations, the financial and logistical aspects of his deployments, and the practicalities of combat. Vermillion also offers insights into military equipment, training standards, and the differences between various fighting forces, emphasizing the importance of individual initiative and adaptability in modern warfare.

Quick Summary

Neil Vermillion, a veteran trainer, emphasizes that combat realities differ from internet advice; soldiers are issued gear and must adapt. He highlights the importance of individual initiative, effective indirect fire support, and the risks of 'war tourists' lacking expertise. His ideal rifle setup is an 18-inch .308 AR-10 with thermal optics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What are Neil Vermillion's motivations for volunteering as a fighter and trainer in conflict zones?

Neil Vermillion's motivations stem from personal connections, such as the death of a friend, and a broader sense of duty to combat perceived evil in the world. He also seeks to make a tangible positive impact by training others and witnessing the results of that training.

How does Neil Vermillion compare the effectiveness of military training between Peshmerga, Ukrainian troops, and Russian forces?

Vermillion notes significant disparities. While some Peshmerga and Ukrainian units are well-trained, others have minimal training. He contrasts highly capable Russian GRU/Wagner units with the general Russian army, often described as 'cannon fodder,' and highlights the impact of Western training on Ukrainian forces.

What are the key differences between fighting with and without effective indirect artillery fire support?

Effective indirect fire is a critical asset for infantry, providing crucial support. Conversely, being on the receiving end of mass artillery barrages is terrifying. Russia's doctrine heavily emphasizes indirect fire, which can obliterate entire grid squares, making it a dominant factor in the conflict.

What are the practical considerations for using slings and high-tech gear in combat according to Neil Vermillion?

Slings are practical for quick transitions between weapon retention and movement, but their use is situational. High-tech gear is an asset when functional and understood, but becomes dead weight or a liability if batteries fail or fundamental skills are lacking. Standardization of batteries is crucial.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Forgotten Weapons

View all →