Sig 320 Banned by cops

Published on October 18, 2024
Duration: 6:53

This video discusses a ban on the Sig Sauer P320 for firearms training by the Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission following two recent discharges. The speaker shares insights from an anonymous source within the commission, suggesting a potential firearm issue rather than a shooter error. It also touches on previous incidents and potential contributing factors like holster compatibility.

Quick Summary

The Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission has banned the Sig Sauer P320 from all firearms training due to two recent discharges. An anonymous source suggests a potential firearm issue, not necessarily a shooter error, and holster compatibility is also considered a contributing factor in some incidents.

Chapters

  1. 00:01Sig P320 Banned by Police Training
  2. 00:24Washington State Training Commission Mandate
  3. 00:38Details on Sig P320 Incidents
  4. 01:18Anonymous Source Insights
  5. 01:33Gun Issue vs. Shooter Issue
  6. 01:57Other Bans and Similar Issues
  7. 02:43Viewer Comments and Reactions
  8. 03:11Trend of Police Incidents with P320s
  9. 03:53Glock vs. Sig Sauer Discussion
  10. 04:13Holster as a Potential Factor
  11. 04:47Blind Defense of the P320
  12. 05:39Why Incidents Occur with Police
  13. 06:13Discharge Circumstances
  14. 06:29Conclusion and Future Updates

Frequently Asked Questions

Why has the Sig Sauer P320 been banned from police firearms training in Washington State?

The Washington State Criminal Justice Training Commission banned the Sig P320 from all firearms training following two recent discharges within the state. The ban took effect immediately, impacting recruits and training programs until further notice.

What are the suspected causes behind the Sig P320 incidents leading to the training ban?

While details are scarce, an anonymous source suggests a firearm issue rather than a shooter error, especially with new recruits. Holster compatibility has also been cited as a potential contributing factor in past incidents involving the P320.

Are there other instances of Sig P320s being restricted or banned?

Yes, some ranges have implemented bans on Sig P320s that lack a thumb safety. The speaker also notes that a higher volume of firearms in circulation, particularly within law enforcement agencies, naturally leads to more reported issues.

Why might police officers experience more issues with firearms like the Sig P320 compared to civilians?

Police officers carry their firearms extensively throughout their shifts, often in holsters for prolonged periods. This constant carry and potential for environmental exposure or holster interaction may contribute to a higher observed rate of incidents compared to civilians who may not carry as frequently.

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from Ben Stoeger

View all →