Why The US Army REALLY Said NO To Glock!

Published on December 12, 2022
Duration: 8:04

This video delves into why the US Army selected the Sig Sauer P320 (M17/M18) over the Glock 19X for its Modular Handgun System trials. The analysis highlights key Army requirements, including a 90% hit rate at 50 meters, improved ergonomics, and a critical need for an external thumb safety. Ultimately, the Army's decision hinged on the superior modularity offered by the Sig Sauer P320's removable chassis system, which allowed for multiple configurations with a single serialized part, proving more cost-effective than Glock's approach of requiring separate firearm purchases for different sizes.

Quick Summary

The US Army rejected the Glock 19X for the XM17 trials primarily due to a lack of true modularity. Sig Sauer's P320 offered a removable chassis system allowing multiple configurations from one serialized part, proving more cost-effective than Glock's need for separate pistol purchases. An external thumb safety and stringent reliability requirements were also key factors in the decision.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction to XM17 Trials
  2. 00:42Trial Requirements
  3. 01:44The Thumb Safety Issue
  4. 02:37The Core Failure: Modularity
  5. 04:01Cost Analysis of Modularity

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did the US Army choose Sig Sauer over Glock for the XM17 trials?

The US Army selected the Sig Sauer P320 (M17) primarily due to its superior modularity. The P320's removable chassis allowed for multiple handgun sizes (full, mid, compact) from a single serialized part, making it more cost-effective than Glock's approach, which required purchasing separate pistols for different configurations.

What were the key requirements for the US Army's XM17 Modular Handgun System?

Key requirements included a 90% hit rate at 50 meters on a 4-inch circle, improved ergonomics, better recoil management, accessory rails, ambidextrous controls, and a reliability standard of 10,000 rounds between failures. An external thumb safety was also a critical, non-negotiable requirement.

How did modularity impact the US Army's decision between Glock and Sig Sauer?

Sig Sauer's P320 offered true modularity by allowing users to swap frames and slides onto a single serialized fire control unit, creating different sized pistols. Glock's 19X required separate firearm purchases for different sizes, making the Sig Sauer system significantly more cost-effective and logistically simpler for the Army.

Was an external thumb safety a factor in the XM17 trials?

Yes, an external thumb safety was a crucial requirement. While Sig Sauer's P320 included this feature, Glock had to modify the 19X specifically for the trials, which reportedly added about $150 to its cost per unit.

Related News

All News →

More Tactical & Gear Videos You Might Like

More from God Family and Guns

View all →