The Iron Sight Cult Ends Today

Published on May 7, 2025
Duration: 21:04

This video argues for the modernization of US Army rifle marksmanship training by replacing the reliance on backup iron sights (BUIS) with advanced optics like the M68 Close Combat Optic (CCO) and the Rifle Combat Optic (RCO). The presenter, a Drill Sergeant Leader, highlights the significant time and resources wasted on BUIS instruction, citing the US Marine Corps' successful integration of ACOGs as a standard issue optic. The paper advocates for revising the Program of Instruction (POI) at the Drill Sergeant Academy to reflect contemporary combat needs and enhance soldier lethality and survivability.

Quick Summary

The US Army's extensive training on backup iron sights (BUIS) for the M4A1 carbine is criticized as a waste of resources, with an estimated 740 hours per drill sergeant. Experts advocate for modern optics like the M68 CCO and RCO, citing the US Marine Corps' successful integration of ACOGs as standard issue for recruits.

Chapters

  1. 00:00Introduction: Hating Backup Iron Sights
  2. 00:19Purpose: Soldier's Perspective on Training
  3. 01:07Strong Stance Against Backup Iron Sights
  4. 01:32US Marine Corps Issues ACOGs
  5. 02:21BUIS on the M4A1 Carbine
  6. 02:46740 Hours of BUIS Instruction
  7. 03:40Ammunition Waste: 64,000 Rounds Per Cycle
  8. 05:34Paper: Targeting Excellence
  9. 05:46Abstract: BUIS Unattainable in Modern Combat
  10. 06:52M68 Aimpoint CCO as Minimum Standard
  11. 07:01RCO (ACOG TA31) as Best Choice
  12. 07:13Revise Drill Sergeant Academy POI
  13. 09:00Limitations of the BUIS
  14. 10:52The Case for the M68 Close Combat Optic
  15. 12:25The Superiority of the Rifle Combat Optic
  16. 13:52Enhanced Accuracy Capabilities
  17. 15:02The Adoption of Optics
  18. 15:46The United States Marine Corps's Integration of the RCO
  19. 16:41Implications for Training at the Drill Sergeant Academy
  20. 17:46Conclusion: Modernize Army Optics
  21. 18:30Cited Resources
  22. 18:51Personal Opinion Disclaimer
  23. 19:15Recap: Waste and Numbers
  24. 19:55Call for Comments
  25. 20:26Support the Channel
  26. 20:41Patreon Support

Frequently Asked Questions

Why is the US Army criticized for its reliance on backup iron sights?

The US Army is criticized for its extensive reliance on backup iron sights (BUIS) for the M4A1 carbine, with an estimated 740 hours of instruction per drill sergeant dedicated to them. Critics argue this is a waste of resources and time, as BUIS are outdated for modern combat and less effective than advanced optics.

What optics does the US Marine Corps issue to recruits?

The US Marine Corps issues the Trijicon ACOG TA31 Rifle Combat Optic (RCO) to every Marine recruit. This standardization ensures recruits are proficient with the optics they will use in combat, enhancing their effectiveness and readiness from the outset.

What are the proposed alternative optics for the US Army?

The proposed alternatives for US Army rifle optics are the M68 Close Combat Optic (CCO) as the minimum acceptable standard and the Rifle Combat Optic (RCO), such as the Trijicon ACOG TA31, as the optimal choice. These optics offer significant advantages in accuracy, speed, and versatility over BUIS.

What are the main limitations of backup iron sights (BUIS)?

Backup iron sights (BUIS) lack structural integrity compared to integrated sights, can lose zero retention due to spring-loaded components, and have smaller apertures that compromise aiming precision, especially at extended ranges. They were never intended as a primary sighting system for modern warfare.

More Training & Techniques Videos You Might Like

More from Trench Grenade

View all →